applejack @applejack@gameliberty.club

@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Good. You should. But you're assuming that jewish modernity knows better how to make your little girls happy than evolved traditions. Marrying them off young means an early start in being a wife and mother, with no chances for degenerate "experimentation" or "finding myself"

@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew
They use phallometrics. But if it's so easy to hide, then it would be kinda hard to explain the rate of it in the general population
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)

I'm not arguing for porn, I'd accept porn being illegal. I'm talking about free-speech in explaining why we should return to tradition. Jewish "civil rights" morality is what made this taboo in the first place, then jewish sociology made up the inherent harm lie, and today pushed by people like the most prominent anti-consent campaigner (((Dr. David Finkelhor)))
"Ultimately, I do continue to believe that the prohibition on adult-child sexual contact is primarily a moral issue. While empirical findings have some relevance they are not the final arbiter...
Some types of social relationships violate deeply held values and principles in our culture about equality and self-determination. Sex between adults and children is one of them. Evidence that certain children have positive experiences does not challenge these values, which have deep roots in our worldview. This is the main reason that Sandfort's research has had relatively little attention, and has little relevance for policy."

@maxmustermann @WorldMAP@anime.website @meowski @Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz @1iceloops123 So if we go by "they need to be married" and "they need to have reached puberty" then it's morally okay. I'd accept that. Personally I think they should be married, but sex plays a part in bonding instead of purely recreation

@maxmustermann @WorldMAP@anime.website @meowski @Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz @1iceloops123 Hint, hint: child marriage (including consummation) was never seen historically as an offence
https://discover-the-truth.com/2013/09/14/bible-child-marriage-in-ancient-israelite-times-paedophilia/

@maxmustermann @WorldMAP@anime.website @meowski @Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz @1iceloops123
So they didn't fuck them for 7 days. If almost every single translation ranges between "young girl" and "female child", then they probably don't mean 16yos. Throughout most of history, including bibliical times, AOC was set at around puberty (or lower, or not set at all, and often wasn't enforced anyway), so chances are they were like 12, 13, or so.
>for yourselves
> [to marry]
>female child of women
>women-children
>women children

If you want to cherry pick what translation suits you best here, that's fine too though.

@Eris @zero @ew

@maxmustermann @WorldMAP@anime.website @meowski @Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz @1iceloops123 Whatever coping version you're using, the pattern is pretty clear that they mean little girls, not women.

@q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew There's nothing anywhere in the US legal code that stays being a pedophile is illegal. Most child rapists aren't even pedophiles, especially among the actual rapists as opposed to those that had consensual sex.
Estimates for the rate of pedophilia in detected child molesters generally range between 25% and 50%.[105] A 2006 study found that 35% of its sample of child molesters were pedophilic.[106] Pedophilia appears to be less common in incest offenders,[107] especially fathers and step-fathers.[108] According to a U.S. study on 2429 adult male sex offenders who were categorized as "pedophiles", only 7% identified themselves as exclusive; indicating that many or most child sexual abusers may fall into the non-exclusive category.[10]

But attraction to "CP" is a good measure of whether someone is a pedo, such as child models or lolicon, so it's fair to call them a pedo

@Eris @zero @ew
1. Nothing was illegal, otherwise call the cops yourself
2. Only under jewish "civil rights" morality. People have been lovingly marrying little girls for thousands of years before modernity. Even in 1950s America it was tolerated (Jerry Lee Lewis and others)
3. You're mad because you're working off of irrational jewmorality. You would lose with actual free speech

@rainignterror1080p @Lox @WorldMAP@anime.website @whyyes @Xeraser @weissrespecter
1. define what you actually need to be developed and understand the "choices", then explain why that's actually needed. People that have looked at this kind of thing have found you don't need to be very smart to understand this.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190401193459/https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2013/10/06/a-less-impaired-vision-of-sexuality/
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J151v01n03_02
“Assessing competency to consent to sexual activity in the cognitively impaired population”, by a certain Carrie Hill Kennedy. A “Sexual Consent and Education Assessment” instrument was used, with two dimensions, “sexual knowledge” and “safety practices”, indicating the ability to make safe decisions. Those judged competent had, on average, an IQ of 65 and an adaptive behaviour age of 9.4 years. Those judged incompetent had average IQ 46 and adaptive behaviour age 6.7 years. This would suggest, at an intermediate position, that competence is achieved at around 8.2 years, and IQ 55.

2. doesn't really relate to anything. Sterile people can have meaningful relationships, but with a child it's even more meaningful since they will be fertile in the future. You're preparing a much stronger family unit to make everyone happier.

3. Wrong. Why would there be a magic self destruct switch evolved into the brain for something kids do to themselves regularly as young as five? It's a made up thing which positive experiences *prove* aren't inherent. Studies that separate between consent and non-consent (which researchers are reluctant to do (for some reason)) show there is no long term harm, and the harm that exists there is tied to whether it's revealed and how much people make the child feel ashamed and guilty of it.The fact it was also tolerated in history shows this, as people wouldn't traumatise their own children for nothing.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9670820/
However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported.

@maxmustermann @WorldMAP@anime.website @meowski @Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz @1iceloops123 Tradition says that fucking nine year old girls is good. You're running blindly on jewish "civil rights" morality. So it is in the bible
Numbers 31:18: But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

@WorldMAP@anime.website @meowski @Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @sjw@neckbeard.xyz @1iceloops123 Cute girl

@Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @meowski @sjw@neckbeard.xyz Nobody has said they are grooming kids, that's illegal. Opal would handle it.

@miria It's just a little hard to deny how cute and hot they are regardless of their clothes

@WorldMAP@anime.website @Lox @whyyes @Xeraser @rainignterror1080p @weissrespecter There's no way to tie intelligence or "maturity" to reproductive rights without being a based anti-whore and anti-black eugenicist

@WorldMAP@anime.website i got 3 days i think

@WorldMAP@anime.website @Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @mrsaturday cute feet

@nahotakamiya @cum People disliking your mental illness isn't oppression. Even if it is, that isn't necessarily a bad thing.