applejack @applejack@gameliberty.club
Joined Apr 2021
@MesugakiTewi@freak.university @carlosruzu @FallenFadedLostItAll@freak.university @Aldo2 They're pretty retarded
@carlosruzu @Aldo2 What? Are you retarded? Masturbation means masturbation, they're looking at how that's related to hormones
@carlosruzu @Aldo2 Yeah, I'd say that's "fine". If she willingly gets drunk in a public setting and then willingly says yes, that's her responsibility. Make your bed and lie in it
That's made up. You know full well people didn't start getting sexual at 18. You should know that's bullshit
In 1880 in the US it was 7-12 too, puberty age, and that wasn't the reason it was raised
>you don't quite know the full effects of what you're doing
Nobody knows what they're doing, and some people much less than others. Look at blacks where 70% of children are born out of wedlock and half of black women have herpes
It makes 20x more sense to restrict them than 15yo Whites that want to start families
@carlosruzu @Aldo2 What does any of that mean? "sexual substances at work", what?
>go on, how do people consent with a person unable to speak?
Well, they'd cry if they were unhappy, and they'd laugh and smile if they were having fun. Not really saying you should fuck 2yos, but this isn't a good argument regardless
@carlosruzu @Aldo2 >conceive the idea of consent
People know the concept of "yes" and "no" even before they can talk. Sex as a concept and it's consequences aren't difficult either
>there's no verifiable way to find that out about someone below the age of consent
If there's no metric for it, by what measure did anyone decide what the AOC should be in the first place?
@wowaname @Aldo2 @carlosruzu It's a normal abbreviation you can look up. I don't have a frequency list of terms in my brain. People generally just ask or look it up if they don't understand something, and that works a lot better than never using terms and much better than complaining about other people doing it
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/SES
And you're focusing on this to distract from the fact you thought I was saying the exact opposite of what I was clearly saying
@wowaname @Aldo2 @carlosruzu I said "and control for SES and actual cases of rape", literally, if you *exclude* rape, there's no long term harm
You somehow thought I was talking about rape
This is a you problem
@wowaname @Aldo2 @carlosruzu If you want to join a random discussion *other people* are having, don't say "I'm not reading all that" or "I don't know what these words mean", just go do something else
@wowaname @Aldo2 @carlosruzu I get the argument but also kinda disagree
It's more "noisy" in one way but it's also less word noise since it's just fewer words, and these distinct concepts are wrapped together. I find it harder to parse if 5 words is actually just one concept
In Icelandic we make distinct concepts like this into compound words instead
Instead of "united states" we have bandaríkin, which solves all problems, but English doesn't like doing that
@wowaname @Aldo2 @carlosruzu
CSE = child sexual experience
AOC = age of consent
SES = socio-economic status
US = united states
I don't think these are that uncommon or undecipherable within context
@Aldo2 @carlosruzu "Statutory rape" is okay. It's a legal (a statute) not a moral concept. Make it not illegal and it stops existing
Even if you want to argue that it's a good general policy, that's separate from it being categorically immoral
Even if it was a good baseline, it's never black and white, you get exceptions, so unless you want to NPC brain and go "breaking the law is immoral", there's no legitimate case to call it immoral
@Zyra Yes, less westernised nations are less brainwashed and suicidal about race, gender, society in general
70,000-100,000 years of separation don't lead to the same people and there's no evolutionary explanation for non-kin based altruism. Non-racism is a fantasy
This isn't news, but that's separate from you deciding what their own motives are for them. Even the nigger himself agreed he wasn't useful
That's just wrong
https://www.historyonthenet.com/d-day-training
>Allied D-Day training and preparing was a vast endeavor, stretching from North America to southern England. Firing ranges were at a premium, as space was needed for practice-firing weapons from rifles to naval gunnery and antiaircraft guns. However, the emphasis was upon amphibious operations and landing, and some facilities had been in use long before June 1944.
>could last years
The *occupation* could last indefinitely, the *war* won't, like you said, most major cities have been captured, and soon they'll all go
@wowaname @Aldo2 @carlosruzu Nobody here at any point said abuse is okay
@Ricotta I could drop a thousand bombs on the US and still be a lessor terrorist than the US
@Zyra You showed a screenshot (didn't post a link) and literally stated that it was because he was "an inferior race", which you would have known is wrong if you read it, so I was pretty sure you didn't read it
I think what you're basically thinking about is foreign volunteer squads. You have a group of people that act as a unit that can communicate between eachother with a leader that can communicate effectively with people above them
They're at least not doing that with him because he has no experience and like they literally said (you don't know their situation better than them), they don't have time or resources to train him, even if they could get him in a squad where he can communicate effectively. This isn't lasting multiple years, there won't be time for training him to be worth anything
@Zyra American/Anglosphere
@Zyra I feel like this might kinda be an American bubble thing, but you're not joining a foreign regiment and then they all start speaking in English for you
From him: "To be fair, I don't think I would be much help shooting. I haven't used a gun before, I don't know the language, I don't know the tactics. I would be better put to work doing something else."
@Zyra They're not conscripting them in the army, and at least then they're capable of speaking Ukrainian and taking orders and communicating, not just standing there with no real ability in the first place
Throwing molotovs at tanks makes things worse too
@Zyra What you're actually seeing is the media worshipping niggers
https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-war-briton-who-volunteered-to-join-fight-against-russia-turned-down-and-told-he-would-be-a-liability-12560778
>However the 37-year-old, who runs a gym in Molesey, Surrey, said his request was rejected by Ukrainian officials because he has no military experience.
They've done that with a bunch of people
@wowaname @Aldo2 @carlosruzu Wait, I literally said "control for SES and actual cases of rape". Wtf are you talking about?
Joined Apr 2021
