Government-to-government foreign aid promotes statism, centralized planning, socialism, dependence, pauperization, inefficiency, and waste. It prolongs the poverty it is designed to cure. Voluntary private investment in private enterprise, on the other hand, promotes capitalism, production, independence, and self-reliance.
You know that you live in the Twilight Zone when Americans support tyranny.
Who wants to live in a prison?
The elites love socialism because they want the 99% weakened and dead.
The police state doesnât protect you. Tyranny helps the elites meet their private prison quotas.
The elites want you to lose your free speech rights and gun rights so you canât resist.
The elites want you to lose your 4th amendment rights so they can wiretap and frisk you and take your property through asset forfeiture.
The elites want you lose your right to a trial so they can torture and kill you.
Taxation is theft. Quit if you donât like low pay and donât buy dangerous food if you donât like it.
You donât have to buy from anyone. You donât have to work at any particular job. You donât have to participate in any given relationship. You can choose.
The big difference between private business and tyranny is that you can boycott the free market, but the government forces you at gunpoint to do something or not do something.
The USSR failed.
The elites control Hollywood, the media, Wall Street, and the government.
Almost nothing major happens in the US without the approval of the elites.
Debt benefits the elites.
Nanny state laws help our overlords meet their private private quotas.
There are wars because the 1% owns the defense companies and they want more refugees to reduce wages.
There are food stamps because the 1% owns the food corporations and makes money from the bank fees.
The ruling class supports Obamacare and mandatory liability insurance laws because they make money from insurance premiums.
The elites support illegal immigration because they want to divide the population.
The 1% supports homosexuality because immorality weakens the US.
When was the last time you saw a movie about the Bill of Rights, freedom, or family values?
Why are immorality, blacks, and illegal immigrants praised, but morality and white men are ridiculed?
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2015/07/15/emotional-caitlyn-jenner-accepts-ashe-courage-award-at-espys/
What if the reason the 99% are not in concentration camps now is because the US Ponzi economy has not collapsed yet and Americans still have guns?
Why is anyone who supports immorality, war, debt, welfare, tyranny, and illegal immigrants is labeled normal, but anyone who supports morals, peace, a balanced budget, personal responsibility, freedom, and reduced immigration is called a spammer, troll, shill, bot, racist, junkie, retard, or nutjob and is censored, banned, gets an IRS audit, is arrested, or killed?
http://www.nj.com/jjournal-news/index.ssf/2015/12/2_secaucus_men_arrested_for_ha.html
The elites donât care if the US collapses because they live in gated compounds with security guards on private islands, go to private schools, and have private jets to fly them to private airports.
Freedom is not your enemy. Tyranny is the enemy.
Wake up.
Think.
Pass the word.
http://bunkerchan.xyz/dprk/
@dcjogger
Which scientifically speaking proves nothing really because at the same time life expectancy was growing faster during Soviet rule in Russia then it is growing now when the government structure is much more liberal in comparison. Don't disregard other factors then political system, please.
Americans have lost their minds.
There is no hope for the US.
There is no indication Americans are resisting wars, debt, or tyranny.
The only options Americans have now are Deep State controlled Trump or Communism.
Voices of reason that support peace, balanced budgets, and freedom like Rand Paul and Amash are being ignored.
Americans may look outside and think that everything appears normal, but soon surveillance cameras might be installed in front of your house, homeless people will move into your neighborhood, your income tax will rise, and your property taxes will soar.
The Gestapo may one day commit summary executions on the street.
The hypothetical laws have become actual laws and the possibility of collapse will soon become a real collapse.
You hate to say the sky falling, but the sky is falling.
Do you really think that the US debt will be able to reach $40 trillion or $300 trillion with no consequences?
What will you do when your ATM card doesn't work?
Do you think that you would be safer on a farm with no electricity in Laos or New York City when the stock market collapses?
Do you really think that the US government cannot build concentration camps in a hurry?
One would hope every state would secede from Washington, DC, but every American soon being employed by the government seems more likely.
Americans either need to become nameless and stateless nomads or buy canned food, guns, and gold today.
The elites want the 99% dead and Americans are too immoral, degraded, depraved, divided, and crippled, too care.
Americans don't seem to care if straws, toothpicks, backpacks, perfume, or toothpaste are banned.
Americans scream guns need to outlawed to prevent murders, but isn't there already a law against murder? Should ropes, rocks, baseball bats, pillows, swimming pools, and fists be banned, too?
The USA used to be rich and Vietnam was so poor that the Vietnamese rented cameras to take pictures.
Now Americans have gone insane and seem to be doing everything possible to run the US into the ground so that the USA will look like North Korea.
The US may be lost, but only those here are able to wake people up.
âNever has our future been more unpredictable, never have we depended so much on political forces that cannot be trusted to follow the rules of common sense and self-interest â forces that look like sheer insanity, if judged by the standards of other centuries.â â Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism
How do you persuade a populace to embrace totalitarianism, that goose-stepping form of tyranny in which the government has all of the power, and âwe the peopleâ have none?
You persuade the people that the menace they face (imaginary or not) is so sinister, so overwhelming, so fearsome that the only way to surmount the danger is by empowering the government to take all necessary steps to quash it, even if that means allowing government jackboots to trample all over the Constitution.
This is how you use the politics of fear to persuade a freedom-loving people to shackle themselves to a dictatorship.
It works the same way every time.
The governmentâs overblown, extended wars on terrorism, drugs, violence, and illegal immigration have been convenient ruses used to terrorized the populace into relinquishing more of their freedoms in exchange for elusive promises of security.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Case in point: On June 17, the same day President Trump announced that the government would be making mass arrests in order to round up and forcibly remove millions of illegal immigrants â including families and children â from the country, the US Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Gamble v United States that placed the sovereignty (ie, the supreme power or authority) of federal and state governments over that of the citizenry, specifically as it relates to the governmentâs ability to disregard the Constitutionâs Double Jeopardy Clause.
At first glance, the two incidents â one relating to illegal immigration and the other to the governmentâs prosecutorial powers â donât have much to do with each other, and yet there is a common thread that binds them together.
That common thread speaks to the nature of the government beast we have been saddled with and how it views the rights and sovereignty of âwe the people.â
Now you donât hear a lot about sovereignty anymore.
Sovereignty is a dusty, antiquated term that harkens back to an age when kings and emperors ruled with absolute power over a populace that had no rights. Americans turned the idea of sovereignty on its head when they declared their independence from Great Britain and rejected the absolute authority of King George III. In doing so, Americans claimed for themselves the right to self-government and established themselves as the ultimate authority and power.
In other words, in America, âwe the peopleâ â sovereign citizens â call the shots.
So when the government acts, it is supposed to do so at our bidding and on our behalf, because we are the rulers.
Thatâs not exactly how it turned out, though, is it?
In the 200-plus years since we boldly embarked on this experiment in self-government, we have been steadily losing ground to the governmentâs brazen power grabs, foisted upon us in the so-called name of national security.
The government has knocked us off our rightful throne. It has usurped our rightful authority. It has staged the ultimate coup. Its agents no longer even pretend that they answer to âwe the people.â
So you see, the two incidents on June 17 were not hugely significant in and of themselves.
Trumpâs plan to carry out mass arrests of anyone the government suspects might be an illegal immigrant, and the Supreme Courtâs recognition that the government can sidestep the Constitution for the sake of expediency, are merely more of the same abuses that have been heaped upon us in recent years.
Yet these incidents speak volumes about how far our republic has fallen and how desensitized âwe the peopleâ have become to this constant undermining of our freedoms.
How do we reconcile the Foundersâ vision of our government as an entity whose only purpose is to serve the people with the police stateâs insistence that the government is the supreme authority, that its power trumps that of the people themselves, and that it may exercise that power in any way it sees fit (that includes government agents crashing through doors, mass arrests, ethnic cleansing, racial profiling, indefinite detentions without due process, and internment camps)?
They cannot be reconciled. They are polar opposites.
We are fast approaching a moment of reckoning where we will be forced to choose between the vision of what America was intended to be (a model for self-governance where power is vested in the people) and the reality of what she has become (a police state where power is vested in the government).
This slide into totalitarianism â helped along by overcriminalization, government surveillance, militarized police, neighbors turning in neighbors, privatized prisons, and forced labor camps, to name just a few similarities â is tracking very closely with what happened in Germany in the years leading up to Hitlerâs rise to power.
We are walking a dangerous path right now.
The horrors of the Nazi concentration camps werenât kept secret from the German people. They were well-publicized. As The Guardian reports:
"The mass of ordinary Germans did know about the evolving terror of Hitler's Holocaust... They knew concentration camps were full of Jewish people who were stigmatised as sub-human and race-defilers. They knew that these, like other groups and minorities, were being killed out of hand. They knew that Adolf Hitler had repeatedly forecast the extermination of every Jew on German soil. They knew these details because they had read about them. They knew because the camps and the measures which led up to them had been prominently and proudly reported step by step in thousands of officially-inspired German media articles and posters⦠The reports, in newspapers and magazines all over the country were phases in a public process of "desensitisation" which worked all too well, culminating in the killing of 6m Jewsâ¦."
Likewise, the mass of ordinary Americans are fully aware of the Trump Administrationâs efforts to stigmatize and dehumanize any and all who do not fit with the governmentâs plans for this country.
These mass arrests of anyone suspected of being an illegal immigrant may well be the shot across the bow.
You see, itâs a short hop, skip, and a jump from allowing government agents to lock large swaths of the population up in detention centers unless or until they can prove that they are not only legally in the country to empowering government agents to subject anyone â citizen and noncitizen alike â to similar treatment unless or until they can prove that they are in compliance with every statute and regulation on the books, and not guilty of having committed some crime or other.
Itâs no longer a matter of if, but when.
You may be innocent of wrongdoing now, but when the standard for innocence is set by the government, no one is safe. Everyone is a suspect, and anyone can be a criminal when itâs the government determining what is a crime.
Remember, the police state does not discriminate.
At some point, once the government has been given the power to do whatever it wants â the Constitution be damned â it will not matter whether youâre an illegal immigrant or a citizen by birth, a law-breaker or someone who marches in lockstep with the governmentâs dictates. Government jails will detain you just as easily whether youâve obeyed every law or broken a dozen. And government agents will treat you like a suspect, whether or not youâve done anything wrong, simply because they have been trained to view and treat everyone like potential criminals.
Eventually, all that will matter is whether some government agent â poorly-trained, utterly ignorant of the Constitution, way too hyped-up on the power of their badges, and authorized to detain, search, interrogate, threaten, and generally harass anyone they see fit â chooses to single you out for special treatment.
Weâve been having this same debate about the perils of government overreach for the past 50-plus years, and still we donât seem to learn, or if we learn, we learn too late.
All of the excessive, abusive tactics employed by the government today â warrantless surveillance, stop and frisk searches, SWAT team raids, roadside strip searches, asset forfeiture schemes, private prisons, indefinite detention, militarized police, etc. â started out as a seemingly well-meaning plan to address some problem in society that needed a little extra help.
Be careful what you wish for: you will get more than you bargained for, especially when the governmentâs involved.
Remember, nothing is ever as simple as the government claims it is.
The war on drugs turned out to be a war on the American people, waged with SWAT teams and militarized police.
The war on terror turned out to be a war on the American people, waged with warrantless surveillance and indefinite detention.
The war on immigration is turning out to be yet another war on the American people, waged with roving government agents demanding âpapers, please.â
Whatever dangerous practices you allow the government to carry out now â whether itâs in the name of national security or protecting Americaâs borders or making America great again â rest assured, these same practices can and will be used against you when the government decides to set its sights on you.
If youâre inclined to advance this double standard because you believe you have done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide, beware: thereâs always a boomerang effect.
As commentator Shaun Kenney observed:
"What civil liberties are you willing to surrender in the apprehension of 12 million people? Knock and drags? Detention centers? Checkpoints? House-to-house searches? Papers, please? Will we be racially profiling folks to look for or are we talking about people of Chinese... Indian... Irish... Polish... Italian... people-who-might-look-like-you descent as well? If the federal government makes a 1% rounding error and accidentally deports an American citizen, that's 120,000 Americans... what means will be used to restore their rights? Who will remunerate them for their financial loss? Restore their lost homes? Personal property? Families? ... What happens when these means are turned against some other group of undesirables in America by a president who does not share your political persuasion, but can now justify the act based on previous justifications?"
We are all at risk.
The law of reciprocity applies here. The flip side of that Golden Rule, which calls for us to treat others as we would have them treat us, is that we shouldnât inflict on others what we wouldnât want to suffer ourselves.
In other words, if you donât want to be locked up in a prison cell or a detention camp â if you donât want to be discriminated against because of the color of your race, religion, politics, or anything else that sets you apart from the rest â if you donât want your loved ones shot at, strip searched, tasered, beaten, and treated like slaves â if you donât want to have to be constantly on guard against government eyes watching what you do, where you go, and what you say â if you donât want to be tortured, waterboarded, or forced to perform degrading acts â if you donât want your children to be forcibly separated from you, caged, and lost â then donât allow these evils to be inflicted on anyone else, no matter how compelling a case the government makes for it or how fervently you believe in the cause.
You canât have it both ways.
You canât live in a constitutional republic if you allow the government to act like a police state.
You canât claim to value freedom if you allow the government to operate like a dictatorship.
You canât expect to have your rights respected if you allow the government to treat whomever it pleases with disrespect and an utter disregard for the rule of law.
Indeed, when the government is allowed to operate as a law unto itself, the rule of law itself becomes illegitimate. As Martin Luther King Jr pointed out in his Letter from a Birmingham Jail, âeverything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was âlegalâ and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was âillegal.â It was âillegalâ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitlerâs Germany.â
In other words, there comes a time when law and order are in direct opposition to justice.
Isnât that what the American Revolution was all about?
Finally, if anyone suggests that the governmentâs mass immigration roundups and arrests are just the government doing its job to fight illegal immigration, donât buy it.
This is not about illegal immigration. Itâs about power and control.
Itâs about testing the waters to see how far the American people will allow the government to go in re-shaping the country in the image of a totalitarian police state.
Itâs about the rise of an âemergency stateâ that justifies all manner of government misconduct and power grabs in the so-called name of national security.
Itâs about how much tyranny âwe the peopleâ will tolerate before we find our conscience and our voice.
Itâs about how far we will allow the government to go in its efforts to distract and divide us and turn us into a fearful, easily controlled populace.
Ultimately, itâs about whether we believe â as the Founders did â that our freedoms are inherently ours and that the government is only as powerful as we allow it to be. Freedom does not flow from the government. It was not given to us, to be taken away at the will of the State. In the same way, the governmentâs appointed purpose is not to threaten or undermine our freedoms, but to safeguard them.
We must get back to this way of thinking if we are to ever stand our ground in the face of threats to those freedoms.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, itâs time to draw that line in the sand.
The treatment being meted out to anyone that looks like an illegal immigrant is only the beginning. Eventually we will all be in the governmentâs crosshairs for one reason or another.
This is the start of the slippery slope.
Martin Niemöller understood this. A Lutheran minister who was imprisoned and executed for opposing Hitler's regime, Niemoller warned:
"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out â Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out â Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak outâBecause I was not a Jew. Then they came for me â and there was no one left to speak for me."