@HankRearden @leyonhjelm @dcjogger the state deserves to die. Centralization of power is a dumb idea.
Wow.
Americans have gone stark-raving mad.
Nazis and Communists scream Libertarians care about trifling issues, but Libertarians aren't the ones who who want to regulate teakwood.
Americans say Nazism is the American way because Communism killed more people.
Americans scream Libertarians support forcing every American to have mandatory credit debt.
Americans swear remaining quiet is the answer to tyranny.
Americans say anyone opposed to TSA groping is an Anarchist.
Americans scream Libertarians are Commies.
Americans insist owning tigers must be illegal because tigers will go extinct, but people now own cats and dogs. Do pet owners have a vested interest in killing their own cats and dogs?
Americans are so retarded today that they say shoes are made by the government.
Americans say US schools have always portrayed the USSR as a paradise.
Americans scream they want to live in a bankrupt warmongering police state because having a nuclear superpower would be safer than having 3000 small countries.
Americans swear freedom means government guaranteed jobs.
Americans insist that you are still moral when you cheat on your wife if you are not bisexual.
Americans scream self-serve gas should be illegal to keep gas prices high.
Americans have become so batshit insane now that they insist anyone wearing a costume, badge, and a gun is a holy god, but do the Gestapo ever make mistakes?
Why should anyone care if you own guns, use prostitutes, go to church, or smoke?
Have Americans ever read a history book before?
Americans have become such pussified snowflakes now that they beg their beloved government overlords to protect them from scary illegal immigrants and guns.
The USA had open borders before, why not now? Do you really think that the US never had black people before today?
If banning guns will stop people from shooting others, will outlawing murder stop homicides?
The government regulates airlines, but do airplanes still crash?
Americans are simply unable to understand that decrees have unintended consequences.
China used to say all birds must be killed, but then insects multiplied and lead to starvation.
China used to say that the population must grow, but population growth lead to a one child policy. Now China doesn't have enough young people and the sex ratio is lopsided because boys outnumber girls.
Americans start wars and are then stunned that there are refugees, terrorism, tyranny, and debt.
The US bans business and then Americans are shocked when homelessness increases.
The US starts a trade war and then Americans are completely dumbfounded that no one buys US exports and prices soar.
Americans say coffee must be banned because it is dangerous, but what if an expert wrote a study saying coffee is safe?
Could there possibly be any other way to other way to help the environment besides arresting users of straws?
Americans scream seatbelts must be mandatory because accidents raise insurance costs, but if insurance rates are so important then why not ban skydiving, rope, swimming pools, and ladders, too?
Americans say that the government should tell you what color to paint your house because property values might decrease, but whose home is it? Do you realize that if the Gestapo can tell your neighbor to remove his garden, the Gestapo could tell you to get rid of your flag?
Do Americans who hate freedom feel like traitors?
Americans hate freedom with a passion.
You know that the US is bad when Americans wonder if the Taliban are really the bad guys. How can countries that torture take the moral high ground on anything?
You know that you live in the Twilight Zone when Americans look you in the eye and say anyone who loves the Bill of Rights is a traitor.
Are Americans such shallow zombies now that they value a paycheck more than morals?
Are Americans just powerless victims?
Would the elites end the wars, restore the Bill of Rights, and reduce the debt if 60 million Americans protested in Washington, DC?
Could Americans stop joining the military?
Could Americans stop joining the Gestapo?
Could Americans stop paying their taxes?
Could Americans tar and feather government workers?
Are Americans just going to let the bankers get away with committing fraud and allow them to keep their billion dollar bailouts?
Should Americans just stand by while the elites turn the USA into a big ball of flames?
Is renouncing their citizenship the only option left for moral Americans?
Assad was supposed to be gone already.
President Obama thought it would be just another âregime changeâ operation and perhaps Assad would end up like Saddam Hussein or Yanukovych. Or maybe even Gaddafi. But he was supposed to be gone. The U.S. spent billions to get rid of him and even provided weapons and training to the kinds of radicals that attacked the United States on 9/11.
But with the help of his allies, Assad has nearly defeated this foreign-sponsored insurgency.
The U.S. fought him every step of the way. Each time the Syrian military approached another occupied city or province, Washington and its obedient allies issued the usual warnings that Assad was not liberating territory but was actually seeking to kill more of his own people.
Remember Aleppo, where the U.S. claimed Assad was planning mass slaughter once he regained control? As usual, the neocons and the media were completely wrong. Even the UN has admitted that with Aleppo back in the hands of the Syrian government, hundreds of thousands of Syrians have actually moved back. We are supposed to believe they willingly returned so that Assad could kill them?
The truth is Aleppo is being rebuilt. Christians celebrated Easter there this spring for the first time in years. There has been no slaughter once al-Qaida and ISISâ hold was broken. Believe me, if there was a slaughter we would have heard about it in the media!
So now, with the Syrian military and its allies prepare to liberate the final Syrian province of Idlib, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo again warns the Syrian government against retaking its own territory. He tweeted on Friday that: âThe three million Syrians, who have already been forced out of their homes and are now in Idlib, will suffer from this aggression. Not good. The world is watching.â
President Trumpâs national security adviser, John Bolton, has also warned the Syrian government that the U.S. will attack if it uses gas in Idlib. Of course, that warning serves as an open invitation to rebels currently holding Idlib to set off another false flag and enjoy U.S. air support.
Bolton and Pompeo are painting Idlib as a peaceful province resisting the violence of an Assad who they claim just enjoys killing his own people. But who controls Idlib province? President Trumpâs own special envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS, Brett McGurk, said in Washington just last year that, âIdlib province is the largest al-Qaida safe-haven since 9/11, tied to directly to Ayman al Zawahiri, this is a huge problem.â
Could someone please remind Pompeo and Bolton that al-Qaida are the bad guys?
After six years of a foreign-backed regime-change operation in Syria, where hundreds of thousands have been killed and the country nearly fell into the hands of ISIS and al-Qaida, the Syrian government is on the verge of victory. Assad is hardly a saint, but does anyone really think al-Qaida and ISIS are preferable? After all, how many Syrians fled the country when Assad was in charge versus when the U.S.-backed ârebelsâ started taking over?
Americans should be outraged that Pompeo and Bolton are defending al-Qaida in Idlib. Itâs time for the neocons to admit they lost. It is time to give Syria back to the Syrians. It is time to pull the U.S. troops from Syria. It is time to just leave Syria alone!