These are public posts tagged with #universalism. You can interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse.
Title: True Universalism and the Imperial Order: An Evolian Perspective
Tags: #Evola #Traditionalism #ImperialOrder #Universalism #SpiritualHierarchy #Rome #AntiModernity #AntiMulticulturalism #NationState #Hierarchy
"We will have White ethnostates one way or the other."
Me:
True universalism transcends multiculturalism, which is merely nationalism in disguise. Rome was an Empire, not a nation-state. Destroy multiculturalism, and you dismantle the aberration of nations, realigning with the imperial order.
Julius Evola's thought emphasizes the hierarchical and traditional order, rejecting modern egalitarian ideologies such as multiculturalism. True universalism, in the Evolian sense, is rooted in a transcendent, spiritual principle that unites diverse peoples under a higher, imperial authority, as exemplified by ancient Rome. This stands in stark contrast to the fragmented, materialistic, and egalitarian nature of the nation-state and multiculturalism, which Evola viewed as degenerate and antithetical to the traditional worldview. The restoration of an imperial order, based on spiritual hierarchy and organic unity, is essential to overcoming the chaos of modernity.
Breaking news from around the world.
Disclose.tvThis book is incredibly powerful and absolutely irrefutable. Read it, inwardly digest it , and share widely.
( Ihad already been a universalist for more than 10 years when I first read this )
John Stuart Mill (in his An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy):
"To say that God's goodness may be different in kind from man's goodness, what is it but saying, with a slight change of phraseology, that God may possibly not be good?"
It makes no more sense, then, to say that God allows creatures to damn themselves out of his love for them or out of his respect for their freedom than to say a father might reasonably allow his deranged child to thrust her face into a fire out of a tender regard for her moral autonomy. And, as absurd as is the idea of someone "in a right mind" choosing eternal loneliness and torment rather than eternal love and bliss, the argument becomes all the more insufferably ludicrous when one considers the personal conditions-ignorance, mortality, defectibility of intellect and will- under which each soul enters the world, and the circumstances- the suffering of all creatures, even the most innocent and delightful of them — with which that world confronts the soul.
…for a rational spirit, to see the good and know it truly is to desire it insatiably and to obey it unconditionally, while not to desire it is not to have known it truly, and so never to have been free to choose it.
The most civilized apologists for the "infernalist" orthodoxies these days, as I have noted elsewhere in these pages, tend to prefer to defend their position by an appeal to creaturely freedom and to God's respect for its dignity. And, as I have also noted, there could scarcely be a poorer argument; whether made crudely or elegantly, it invariably fails, because it depends upon an incoherent model of freedom.
“In the end of all things is their beginning, and only from the perspective of the end can one know what they are, why they have been made, and who the God is who has called them forth from nothingness. Anything willingly done is done toward an end; and anything done toward an end is defined by that end. And in Gregory's thought, with an integrity found only also in Origen and Maximus, protology and eschatology are a single science, a single revelation disclosed in the God-man.”
“Unlike, say, the great Hans Urs von Balthasar (1905-1988), I would not think it worth the trouble to argue, as he does, that—given the paradoxes and seemingly irreconcilable pronouncements of scriptures on the final state of all things — Christians may be allowed to dare to hope for the salvation of all. In fact, I have very small patience for this kind of "hopeful universalism," as it is often called. As far as I am concerned, anyone who hopes for the universal reconciliation of creatures with God must already believe that this would be the best possible ending to the Christian story; and such a person has then no excuse for imagining that God could bring any but the best possible ending to pass without thereby being in some sense a failed creator. The position I want to attempt to argue, therefore, to see how well it holds together, is far more extreme; to wit, that, if Christianity is in any way true, Christians dare not doubt the salvation of all, and that any understanding of what God accomplished in Christ that does not include the assurance of a final apokatastasis in which all things created are redeemed and joined to God is ultimately entirely incoherent and unworthy of rational faith.”
Exactly right
Absolutely right, DBH.
“I have always found what became the traditional majority Christian view of hell— that is, a conscious state of perpetual torment— a genuinely odious idea, both morally and emotionally, and still think it the single best argument for doubting the plausibility of the Christian faith as a coherent body of doctrine or as a morally worthy system of devotion.”
That All Shall Be Saved, p. 65
"Postwar European education campaigns coded #Europe as both white and raceless, Christian and secular."
Emily #Marker draws from her work on the French #education system to discuss #race and #universalism: https://tocqueville21.com/books/authors-response-black-france-white-europe-emily-marker/
#book #whiteness #coloniality #meritocracy #feminisms #decoloniality #antiRacism #FRPol #academy #university #integration #colorblindness #democratisation #Europeanness
#livre #racialisation #decoloniale #antiracisme #blanchité #racismeSystémique #colonialité #méritocratie #lectureDécoloniale #islamogauchisme #France #décolonisation
**This is the author’s response in our book forum on…
Tocqueville21Justification then is actually a matter of God’s sovereignty and action—not toward just a part but inclusive of the whole. #universalsalvation #justification #universalism #healingthegospel
As James Denney wrote, more than a century ago, “The paradoxical phrase, Him that justifieth the ungodly, does not suggest that justification is a fiction, whether legal or any other sort, but that it is a miracle. It is a thing that only God can achieve.”
Awesome video on how both sides can handle deconstruction of faith.
I resonate with not having people to talk to about the process.
https://youtu.be/XABq2rR_E4U
#ChristianDeconstruction #deconstruction #faith #christian #religion #belief #universalism
hbd chick Retweeted:
hbd chick @hbdchick
#Universalism vs. #Particularism (pg. 81: https://books.google.com/books?id=DTr02hvFY1UC …)
--
Original: https://www.twitter.com/hbdchick/status/675872017674031104
#Google
Full-List of bots: https://joejoe.github.io/mastodon
hbd chick Retweeted:
hbd chick @hbdchick
from the first issue of Philosophical Transactions published in 1665 ( http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/1/0.1.full.pdf+html …):
"for...the Universal Good of Mankind." #Universalism
--
Original: https://www.twitter.com/hbdchick/status/1025138275688886283
#NSA
Full-List of bots: https://joejoe.github.io/mastodon
the jews enslaved white people under communism
the jews enslaved white people under globalism
christians enslave white people under universalism
WHERE IS FREEDOM. ARE YOU FREE WHITE MAN.
equality is a false god.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyJ_EX1UPtA #BishopBarron wrote the forward to Hans Urs Von Balthasar's republished book *Dare We Hope That All Men Be Saved." Is this "practical #universalism ?" Dr Taylor Marshall and Timothy Gordon discuss #Balthasar and Barron's teaching in light of #Scripture , Fathers, Thomas Aquinas, and others. Ket to this debate is the #doctrine of Christ's descent into Limbo. They examine how Catholics have lost all fear of #Hell and how this has weakened the #Catholic Church since the 1960s.