@q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew There's nothing anywhere in the US legal code that stays being a pedophile is illegal. Most child rapists aren't even pedophiles, especially among the actual rapists as opposed to those that had consensual sex.
Estimates for the rate of pedophilia in detected child molesters generally range between 25% and 50%.[105] A 2006 study found that 35% of its sample of child molesters were pedophilic.[106] Pedophilia appears to be less common in incest offenders,[107] especially fathers and step-fathers.[108] According to a U.S. study on 2429 adult male sex offenders who were categorized as "pedophiles", only 7% identified themselves as exclusive; indicating that many or most child sexual abusers may fall into the non-exclusive category.[10]
But attraction to "CP" is a good measure of whether someone is a pedo, such as child models or lolicon, so it's fair to call them a pedo
@ew @PROtoss987 @Eris @Returned_tryhard @q @zero Whenever there are anti encryption laws that will 100% punish political right wing dissidents (such as those calling for the open violent murder of people), they bring up child porn and grooming and this other garbage. Other right wingers will unironically end us all just to "own le pedos" on behalf of Schlomo
@Eris @q @Returned_tryhard @PROtoss987 @zero @ew This is some serious non-argument. If you feel the need to go to this extent to make a non-argument to everything I say, are you trying to convince me or yourself?
Me: You are a pedophile I am not going to argue with you
You: That's not an argument!!!!
Yeah dude I know.
@Eris @q @Returned_tryhard @PROtoss987 @zero @ew So you concede. Good discussion. Have a great day
@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Killing people to advance your political position is completely legitimate and sane, but you also need to be kinda pragmatic with it, otherwise you'll just create an unstable environment that ends up killing you
@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Winning means maximising your own happiness. Your happiness relies on others, and their happiness relies on feeling safe, such as not being able to be randomly picked out to be killed for nothing
@Eris @q @Returned_tryhard @PROtoss987 @zero @ew "follow my intuition" means you could be killed for quite literally nothing, yes
@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Good. You should. But you're assuming that jewish modernity knows better how to make your little girls happy than evolved traditions. Marrying them off young means an early start in being a wife and mother, with no chances for degenerate "experimentation" or "finding myself"
@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Look, this comes up and involves what I'm arguing for, it's just not exclusively that. I'm arguing for what I'm arguing for. They should be married and they should have parental consent for it. If we agree, okay, great.
>I'm arguing for what I'm arguing for.
Having sex with twelve year olds.
@Eris @q @Returned_tryhard @PROtoss987 @zero @ew And younger. Within wholesome monogamous marriages :)
@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew
They use phallometrics. But if it's so easy to hide, then it would be kinda hard to explain the rate of it in the general population
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)
I'm not arguing for porn, I'd accept porn being illegal. I'm talking about free-speech in explaining why we should return to tradition. Jewish "civil rights" morality is what made this taboo in the first place, then jewish sociology made up the inherent harm lie, and today pushed by people like the most prominent anti-consent campaigner (((Dr. David Finkelhor)))
"Ultimately, I do continue to believe that the prohibition on adult-child sexual contact is primarily a moral issue. While empirical findings have some relevance they are not the final arbiter...
Some types of social relationships violate deeply held values and principles in our culture about equality and self-determination. Sex between adults and children is one of them. Evidence that certain children have positive experiences does not challenge these values, which have deep roots in our worldview. This is the main reason that Sandfort's research has had relatively little attention, and has little relevance for policy."
@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew I'm not ignoring this, I know it's untrue. I've already posted about it. People were marrying 12yos are late as the 1950s, how the hell would they get traumatised without people knowing? Just the fact positive experiences exist at all proves this isn't true, but:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9670820/
Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported.
Also what mechanism does it work on. I know with jewish sociology you just make stuff up and pretend it's obvious, but why would they have evolved a self destruct switch for something they do themselves without issue and for something that involves no force, stress, harm, and can even feel good and satisfying. It's a bonding activity for a reason.
@Eris @q @Returned_tryhard @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Then I'd imagine you'd have a pretty good answer. So, why?
@Eris @q @Returned_tryhard @PROtoss987 @zero @ew He used the left wing cope of "if you get fired maybe you shouldn't have been a RACIST 😏" on pedos without self reflecting a bit beforehand
@Eris @q @Returned_tryhard @PROtoss987 @zero @ew According to modernity, both are. According to tradition, neither are. I'm not the picking and choosing here.
@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew It sounds like you don't have an answer. I talk about what's on my mind IRL and people don't care, it's not as sensationalised as the internet.
@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Society cannot be happy while people blindly follow modern jewish morality over evolved traditions
Tough choice.
Also, "porn is free speech" is literally a Jewish argument that they used to introduce and industrialize porn here.