@q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew There's nothing anywhere in the US legal code that stays being a pedophile is illegal. Most child rapists aren't even pedophiles, especially among the actual rapists as opposed to those that had consensual sex.
Estimates for the rate of pedophilia in detected child molesters generally range between 25% and 50%.[105] A 2006 study found that 35% of its sample of child molesters were pedophilic.[106] Pedophilia appears to be less common in incest offenders,[107] especially fathers and step-fathers.[108] According to a U.S. study on 2429 adult male sex offenders who were categorized as "pedophiles", only 7% identified themselves as exclusive; indicating that many or most child sexual abusers may fall into the non-exclusive category.[10]

But attraction to "CP" is a good measure of whether someone is a pedo, such as child models or lolicon, so it's fair to call them a pedo

@applejack @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew "wow lots of people who molested children told our labcoats that they didn't actually want to! That means it's rare!" Never, ever trust surveys as "science."

Also, "porn is free speech" is literally a Jewish argument that they used to introduce and industrialize porn here.

@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew
They use phallometrics. But if it's so easy to hide, then it would be kinda hard to explain the rate of it in the general population
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)

I'm not arguing for porn, I'd accept porn being illegal. I'm talking about free-speech in explaining why we should return to tradition. Jewish "civil rights" morality is what made this taboo in the first place, then jewish sociology made up the inherent harm lie, and today pushed by people like the most prominent anti-consent campaigner (((Dr. David Finkelhor)))
"Ultimately, I do continue to believe that the prohibition on adult-child sexual contact is primarily a moral issue. While empirical findings have some relevance they are not the final arbiter...
Some types of social relationships violate deeply held values and principles in our culture about equality and self-determination. Sex between adults and children is one of them. Evidence that certain children have positive experiences does not challenge these values, which have deep roots in our worldview. This is the main reason that Sandfort's research has had relatively little attention, and has little relevance for policy."

@applejack @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew on the one hand, yes, age of consent laws at present were made by Jews to screw with society. On the other hand it doesn't take much research at all to figure out that relationships between adults and children are deeply harmful and usually result in depression, psychosis, gender dysphoria, and a whole host of other issues, and the fact you're ignoring this is disgusting

@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew I'm not ignoring this, I know it's untrue. I've already posted about it. People were marrying 12yos are late as the 1950s, how the hell would they get traumatised without people knowing? Just the fact positive experiences exist at all proves this isn't true, but:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9670820/
Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported.

Also what mechanism does it work on. I know with jewish sociology you just make stuff up and pretend it's obvious, but why would they have evolved a self destruct switch for something they do themselves without issue and for something that involves no force, stress, harm, and can even feel good and satisfying. It's a bonding activity for a reason.

@applejack @Returned_tryhard @q @PROtoss987 @zero @ew bruh do not fuck 12 year olds

@Eris @q @Returned_tryhard @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Why?

@applejack @Eris @q @PROtoss987 @zero @ew @ew be prepared to never ever talk to anyone irl or ever interact with anyone irl ever again in your entire life and live in a bunker, people who ask questions like this even to play devil's advocate will be put down.

@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew It sounds like you don't have an answer. I talk about what's on my mind IRL and people don't care, it's not as sensationalised as the internet.

@applejack @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew what a shocker, Sodom is unconcerned about the sins of Sodom. My comment was more for ew talking about being anonymous. I do have an answer and it's that if you really believe what you're saying then you are 1. Going to hell and 2. Should go there as soon as possible. Society cannot be healthy with people like you in it.

@Returned_tryhard @q @Eris @PROtoss987 @zero @ew Society cannot be happy while people blindly follow modern jewish morality over evolved traditions