Show older
@ew @Eris @PROtoss987 @Returned_tryhard @applejack @eTerrorist @q @rats @xxshtxx @zero Again you know what I do. You can't turn that into something unethical. Unless you're a pedo.
@ew @Eris @PROtoss987 @Returned_tryhard @applejack @eTerrorist @q @rats @xxshtxx @zero You can think that all you want. I just know it takes grit to get through it, you have no idea how bad it is out there.
@D00B @Eris @PROtoss987 @Returned_tryhard @applejack @eTerrorist @q @rats @xxshtxx @zero I already know you want to fuck kids just admit it you dirty kid fucker. I bet you're thinking about it right now. just stop, get some help. go to a therapy session and stop wanting to fuck little kids.
@D00B @Eris @PROtoss987 @Returned_tryhard @applejack @eTerrorist @q @rats @xxshtxx @zero once again you're the one who looks at child porn because you've positioned yourself in a place where you can legally do it for fun
@ew @Eris @PROtoss987 @Returned_tryhard @applejack @eTerrorist @q @rats @xxshtxx @zero thought they were just "images" that didn't hurt anyone now it's child porn are you sure you want to take that stance?
@D00B @Eris @PROtoss987 @Returned_tryhard @applejack @eTerrorist @q @rats @xxshtxx @zero don't worry whenever I see you having a conversation with someone I'll chip in to mention that you watch child porn all day, because you're a pedophile who deserves it

@applejack notice how i said “child pornography” in my post and not say, “hentai” or “drawings”

if by “right” you mean pedophile, then yes

@eTerrorist Right means right. But I am a pedophile, so what's your point? How is real literal child pornography except from free speech?

@applejack same way armed robbery isn't covered by the second amendment, retard

@eTerrorist Who are you robbing at gunpoint by having/sharing bytes on a computer? I don't think you thought that through

@applejack there’s no right to somebody else’s body and privacy, just like there’s no right to somebody else’s property you stole at gunpoint. i don’t think you thought this through.

@eTerrorist 1st, that's arbitrary. If you want to make arbitrary exceptions to free-speech, then admit that's what you're doing. But second, that makes any image of another person immoral. You really really didn't think that through

@applejack all rights themselves are completely arbitrary, retard.

Also, yes, having pictures of a child being raped is immoral. And that isn’t arbitrary

@eTerrorist Which is why they don't exist.
Why? And you don't need rape for CP. You could have completely consensual, completely harmless, plain nude and suggestive media, or just consensual sex, or nude selfies, whatever. CP communities generally regulate against hurtcore anyway

@eTerrorist @admin I've broken no rules, friend :). Now tell me how I'm wrong.

@applejack @admin if you really can’t understand how having sex with kids is wrong only a bullet will help you

@eTerrorist @admin Do you think 99% of human history deserves a bullet, or are you (along with the jewish modernity that taught you) wrong? Literally everyone thought it was okay to have sex with little girls until jewish civil rights and sociology. Even in the 1950s you could marry and fuck a 12yo, like Jerry Lee Lewis did

@applejack @eTerrorist @admin >Does 99% of human history deserve a bullet for raping kids

Fucking **YES** retard. Do you have any idea the physical damage sex with children causes? Permanent deformities. It happens with border hoppers all the time.

Btw the original draft of the Constitution said the 1st Amendment didn't apply to pedophiles or coomers but the Jews used white out to cover it up.

Imagine unironically using the line "Hurr durr my great grandpa raped kids so it must be okay."
@SneedsterSpeedster @admin @applejack @eTerrorist @stevejail Sola scriptura is cringe.
Slavery is rightfully condemned in the declaration of independence as a violation of god-given rights.
@Eris @SneedsterSpeedster @admin @applejack @eTerrorist Philemon; A short, forgettable little letter in the New Testament. Doesn't forbid slavery, but does set an example that slaves should be treated as brethren.

I think you could use it to condemn slavery even with sola scriptura.

@stevejail @admin @Eris @SneedsterSpeedster @eTerrorist It's quite literally saying slavery should exist if they're putting a standard on it. And for every 1 of those you'll find 50 times where people are quite literally told to take slaves

@applejack @stevejail @admin @SneedsterSpeedster @eTerrorist It can put a standard on a behavior that it doesn't condone. The bible has many such cases.

@Eris @admin @SneedsterSpeedster @stevejail @eTerrorist It doesn't condone it, it actively tells people to do it. Multiple passages it just tells the slaves to be obedient too

@applejack @admin @SneedsterSpeedster @stevejail @eTerrorist None of that condones or condemns slavery. The bible also has verses on how to pay taxes, while condemning the kings you pay taxes to.
Much of the bible, particularly the epistles, but also other parts such as those describing the babylonian captivity, give advice on how to be moral in an immoral society which participates in immoral practices such as slavery.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.