@RikaDerufu Homosexuality is natural the same way cancer and schizophrenia are. Why on earth support it? It's a mental illness that follows with it a laundry list if problems.
@RikaDerufu Yeah, you're right. It's wrong to use a service you enjoy without supporting it. I will change my ways from now on 🙏🏻
@Emperor1 @RikaDerufu It's as natural as cancer. It's a genetic/developmental disease.
https://slate.com/technology/2008/06/a-genetic-theory-of-homosexuality.html
@Emperor1 @RikaDerufu
>reproduction isn't the defining characteristic of love
Yes, it is. That's the single core reason it evolved. Our sole function is reproduction and helping our kin.
>as long as people aren't bothering you
Cancer patients don't bother me, but it's still a horrible disease. They're degenerate towards society, tolerating them does actively cause me and the people I care about harm. The value of marriage is reduced, kids are taught degenerate mind-rotting anal sex hedonistic garbage, they spread disease, they're I think 40-50% of serial killers, like 30% of child rapists, and the entire view of putting some tiny minority over the needs of the majority is harmful to society
> live and let live
Why? It's a nice sounding platitude but why should we
@Emperor1 @RikaDerufu
That's wrong. Exaptation means the utility of a trait changes to serve a different purpose, like bird feathers adapting from warmth to flight.
Every trait starts off because of a mutation, that's at the core of the theory, but selection pressures change the gene frequencies around.
"Selection pressures" means replication probability, which means copies of genes within yourself or your kin. If you have any other method of selection, go pick up your Nobel.
@Emperor1 @RikaDerufu So what's the purpose? I posted the best explanation we have, which is the sexually antagonistic theory. Female genes disable male genes by making them essentially infertile, literally sabotaging them.