Every time I see white bois in my replies crying about the state of huwite women I get annoyed. People are going to start making me out as some creepy male feminist but if this ideological front is lost then there is no future. Indeed, in 1933 (before Third Reich was in full swing and Hitler had to win votes to secure power in 1934), the Nazis put on displays to solicit women into the party (who gained voting rights in the Weimar in 1918). Their motto was: "Volk without Children, Volk without Future".

The Deutsches Frauenwerk was established late 1933 and so women were very welcome into the party and voted to elect Hitler full control over the country in 1934.

Historians remark that it would have been impossible for Hitler and the party to have won these elections without the support of women, as they were fully emancipated. If their vision for Germany was so appalling and antithetical to free women, then it would not have happened. So it's important to remember that Hitler's ascent to power was made with the assent of women.

Fast forward to 2016, Trump wins the electoral college in a situation only White women were allowed to vote. In 2020, Trump still wins with 55% of the vote.

White women are 52% of the population. White women are the only people on Earth capable of producing White children. White women are the only acceptable partner for a White man. People thinking they will escape to some chinky shithole to make gross chinky mutt babies in will have a family branch which is not supported in their 'based' 'trad' homeland, nor a properly White child who will identify with your heritage.

Women will gravitate toward your politics. They do not particularly care. What they want is security and stability more than anything else.

The average age a woman got married in the 1800s was 26. The first child was 28. They had kids until their mid-to-late 30s. It's time to set aside this cringe-inducing, juvenile fetishization of mentally underdeveloped teenagers and asians.
Follow

@josh
>The average age a woman got married in the 1800s was 26. The first child was 28.
That's just obviously wrong and the graph you posted doesn't even remotely imply that, but the opposite.
In the latest of the late 1800s women got married at 22.
thespruce.com/estimated-median (and this is with the fact that historians are averse to counting very young marriages)

Further back it was even lower. For most of history (which is what we biologically evolved for) women had their first child at 16.
womenofhistory.blogspot.com/20

Younger is better. Everyone knows it.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.