just to be clear, here's what i think a youth+lover movement could coalesce around:
1) sex is good
2) kids decide
3) no sex police
right now we're split over "sex is good" with the contact debate. but irl it's a moot point: child sexuality is everywhere criminalized. the nays have it.
what we should be pushing for instead is "kids decide," in all areas of life, in other words youth liberation. that'll reveal pretty quickly which "anti-cs" and which "pro-cs" are really about freedom versus power/control.
"no sex police" is obvious when it's the law, the courts, and the prisons. but shouldn't we practice abolishing the cops in our own heads and communities in preparation for a world without sex police?
1) sex is good
2) kids decide
3) no sex police
right now we're split over "sex is good" with the contact debate. but irl it's a moot point: child sexuality is everywhere criminalized. the nays have it.
what we should be pushing for instead is "kids decide," in all areas of life, in other words youth liberation. that'll reveal pretty quickly which "anti-cs" and which "pro-cs" are really about freedom versus power/control.
"no sex police" is obvious when it's the law, the courts, and the prisons. but shouldn't we practice abolishing the cops in our own heads and communities in preparation for a world without sex police?
Follow
@hoakelenli That's fucking retarded. Nobody gives a shit about "power/control" unless you're already a lolbert that arbitrarily agrees. That's fucking retarded. Yes, controlling kids for their own benefit is a good thing, obviously
