@s8n @roboneko @1iceloops123 @bot
>drawings are not cp in the united states of america
"Virtual child pornography" (the term used in the statue) is still child pornography under United States law. _Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition_ did not change the legal definition of child pornography. It tightened the child pornography exception to the First Amendment to only include child pornography where a real child was harmed in its production. Other forms of child pornography are legal.
Lolicon is child pornography.
>drawings are not cp in the united states of america
"Virtual child pornography" (the term used in the statue) is still child pornography under United States law. _Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition_ did not change the legal definition of child pornography. It tightened the child pornography exception to the First Amendment to only include child pornography where a real child was harmed in its production. Other forms of child pornography are legal.
Lolicon is child pornography.
@NEETzsche @roboneko @s8n @1iceloops123 @bot It's true that lolicon is porn depicting children and so "child porn", but you're using it to be misleading, to actively lie.
If you were to tickle your own daughter it could be factually described as "you molested your daughter" since "to molest" can mean "To disturb or tamper with". The actual intended meaning is the false bit
Follow
@NEETzsche @roboneko @s8n @1iceloops123 @bot It's a subtle distinction, and it's why Neko and The Lord of Dankness were pretty fairly arguing that it's not, because it isn't *in the sense you're trying to frame it as*
