@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate They are and so are the Reps. They're equally in love with sodomy and niggers, that's what defines leftism
Doesn't change anything if one gets payed by Adelson and the other by Bloomberg, it's kike finklethink regardless
@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate As an ideology it's a hyper complicated and mystified, just completely made up, framework of ying yang style forces (dialectics) that you then shove things into
It's that kike trait of mystifying and pilpuling reality into rabbinical batshit so you can say anything is anything by layers and layers of abstraction
It sometimes is even literally mystical, with weird (and completely wrong) theories about human evolution, matter and consciousness, and a fuckton of other shit
As an end goal it's a society where everyone is equal (somehow), nobody is forced to do anything (somehow), there is no hierarchy and it doesn't develop (somehow), everyone shares equally (for some reason), and crime doesn't exist because in the dual ying yang shenanigans communists actually think crime only exists from friction with class conflict
@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate I like when communists literally just admit they only care about the nice happy end goals without even bothering with their own theory
@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate Nigger, that's the intro blurb and it even has a hyperlink to tell you what idealism means, it's not utopian, it's the idea that reality only exists in the mind as opposed to materialism
@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate I like that I explain how retarded communism is, and to distract from that you end up not understanding terms and somehow end up saying "because they think reality is existent outside of the mind it's not complicated", for some reason
@Spaghettimon @Mysha @prouddegenerate
Fucking "the world spirit"
https://www.britannica.com/topic/dialectical-materialism
>Marx’s and Engels’ conception of dialectics owes much to the German idealist philosopher G.W.F. Hegel. In opposition to the “metaphysical” mode of thought, which viewed things in abstraction, each by itself and as though endowed with fixed properties, Hegelian dialectics considers things in their movements and changes, interrelations and interactions. Everything is in continual process of becoming and ceasing to be, in which nothing is permanent but everything changes and is eventually superseded. All things contain contradictory sides or aspects, whose tension or conflict is the driving force of change and eventually transforms or dissolves them. But whereas Hegel saw change and development as the expression of the world spirit, or Idea, realizing itself in nature and in human society, for Marx and Engels change was inherent in the nature of the material world. They therefore held that one could not, as Hegel tried, deduce the actual course of events from any “principles of dialectics”; the principles must be inferred from the events.