Like unironically he said that
@Terry There is nothing wrong with being a pedophile
and, the word "prey" is quite definitely what it is. the entire rest of society *defensively* vilifies and hates pedophiles for the same reason they vilify and hate rapists or killers: because, by their very nature, pedophiles (et al.) are *predators* against the rest of the citizenry; they represent a danger or a threat to others and their loved ones
are you born a pedophile? can you not help your inclinations or neurology? in most cases that probably *is* the case, and there is nothing *morally* wrong with that so long as one recognizes the deviance, does not act upon it, and seeks help. we should not demonize people for things outside of their control. it *is* wrong from an amoral, empirical evolutionary view--i.e.: humans are not meant to be attracted to prepubescent children. it is wrong in the same way a manufacturing defect on a part of machine would be wrong. it's "incorrect" or faulty. it's "wrong" in precisely the same way that homosexuality is "wrong", regardless of morality
but to say "there is nothing wrong with being a pedophile" in the sense that, proudly, one does not think there is anything perverse or blackhearted in trying to fuck a child, then such a statement is simply the gloat of a predator.
@Terry
@knhy @Terry Being a rapist or killer is an action, pedophilia is an attraction, and anyone can make up this meme
"Being a racist is just like being a murderer"
Society in general also vilifies racists, btw. People never saw pedos as a threat until media hysteria, same as racism
Age of consent in the US in 1880 was 7-12
Get something better
>humans are not meant to be attracted to prepubescent children
Wrong. Monopolising them before puberty is advantageous when you're monogamous, then their entire sexual life is yours
proportion of men more or equally sexually aroused by children (up to 13 years old) than by adults:
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)
In this study men rated female faces about 13 years old the most attractive
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237004330_Facial_Olfactory_and_Vocal_Cues_to_Female_Reproductive_Value
The BMI men find the most attractive is about 17-20 which is the typical BMI for girls about 13
Guess why girls we're generally married at 12-16 historically
https://www.thecollector.com/pedophilia-ancient-greece-rome/
https://www.historyonthenet.com/viking-society-women-and-children
for now they call it bad. But the point of these "peer reviewed" studies is to slowly normalize it just like they did with trannys
@Terry @knhy @bsdloli It was universally accepted in the past, then came a social justice campaign against it
There is NO mainstream action in favour of it
A saloon article saying that non-offending pedos shouldn't by lynched or an article echoing decades old mainstream opinion isn't evidence to the contrary
There's more actual action against it being normalised. Lolicon being illegal is a more recent thing, and now the UN is trying to crack down on japan having it
It all starts in academia. You probably saw the pedo apologist on the news about a week ago. This is just the beginning. Next step is decriminalize pedophilia or at least make it a lesser offense and to do away with the sex offender registry.
Inb4 that will happen. Its already happenned in California. Its no longer a felony to fuck a minor up to 10 years younger than you.
@Terry @knhy @bsdloli Friend, I saw that video years ago. An academic making philosophical points on a podcast for dissidents isn't a point for it being mainstream
That fucking tiktok account needed to take a video that was several years old, for fucks sake
AOC is still 18 in California. It's 16 in like half the US , and
>If the defendant is older than the victim by three years or less, statutory rape is a misdemeanor offense. If the defendant is more than three years older than the victim , the offense is a “wobbler” which can be charged as a felony or a misdemeanor.
Up to the judge, I guess. Look at actual sentencing stats to make a judgement on that
