@miria @tsumi Then you're refusing to make a new contract because the previous one wasn't enforced, like I said. And this isn't a lasting strategy either

@applejack @tsumi You're changing the subject. You said you need violence to enforce contratcts. I said that's not true.

@miria @tsumi You made a scenario where the contract wasn't enforced

@applejack @tsumi Fair enough. In any case, you don't need actual force to make contracts work. We've had that figured out for thousands of years.

@miria @tsumi Any interaction that isn't based on some kind of altruism like family and friends is based on some tangible threat of violence

And even a lot of altruism has roots in tangible threats of violence. Mutualism, including contracts, evolved because violence is more costly than just being nice if the other party can dish it back

If you stop being violent, it becomes an unstable strategy and the people that are willing to use violence win

@tsumi @miria Compared to non-market anarchists that just want nothing done and magically it works out

>crime just wont happen
>we'll just be nice and share
>we'll have no hierarchy but enforce the majority wants somehow
>power rules don't exist and you can't use a power asymmetry to gain more power, so this is stable

This is the peak of communist ideology (the most delusional pipe-dream imaginable)

@applejack @miria

I don't give a shit about what you say you're a politically illiterate, historically uneducated and anthropologically disinformed rightoid just like most right wingers.

"communism doesn't work"

it would but socialism has failed everytime to imperialist fucklords intervening because they'd otherwise lose their power. argue with someone in your league, I'm miles above you.