Check this shit out. Modern "anarchists" support enforced monogamy.
@miria A marriage is a contract. Should you not enforce contracts?
@applejack If you're forced to sign the contract, no.
@miria I don't think anyone is counting shotgun weddings
@applejack Enforced monogamy
@miria >agree to get married
>can't be a whore no more
>WHERE IS MY FREEDOM??
???
@applejack @miria contracts under anarchism fail on a conceptual level. who's gonna enforce anything. also
> whore
> non monogamous
imagine reducing yourself to 1 bitch lmfao. couldn't be me
> whore
> non monogamous
imagine reducing yourself to 1 bitch lmfao. couldn't be me
@applejack @tsumi >Contracts are always conceptual. You need violence to enforce them
That's not true. You can refuse to provide goods and services to someone who doesn't follow contracts.
That's not true. You can refuse to provide goods and services to someone who doesn't follow contracts.
@applejack @tsumi You're changing the subject. You said you need violence to enforce contratcts. I said that's not true.
@applejack @tsumi Fair enough. In any case, you don't need actual force to make contracts work. We've had that figured out for thousands of years.
@miria @tsumi Any interaction that isn't based on some kind of altruism like family and friends is based on some tangible threat of violence
And even a lot of altruism has roots in tangible threats of violence. Mutualism, including contracts, evolved because violence is more costly than just being nice if the other party can dish it back
If you stop being violent, it becomes an unstable strategy and the people that are willing to use violence win
