i'm going back to reading my actuary book, this stuff is too dramatic for me

@applejack @Terry @Dave @fluffy

> I have looked at them

Lie. I asked you for the titles, you refused to give them. You didn't even know what journal they were published in. I had to dig them up myself. They show the exact opposite of what you claim they show.

> by posting a similar number I post

I was using *your* numbers, dipshit.

> the majority of child molesters not being pedos

The majority of pedos are child molesters. You are using statistics deceptively because you were told by a debate script to say this if they say this, you don't actually understand the math, you're just trying to sprinkle it like magic because you're a goddamn bot:

> Conversations became one man with one microphone attached to a thousand megaphones, and replying was like talking back to the national news broadcast, because you could reply to a shill, but the man giving the shill her script was not listening, because he was running a hundred similar shills, and his shill would just stick to her script, the script he had assigned to her no matter what you replied to her script.
> Her replies to your reply would be unresponsive, because they came from a script written by a man who had never thought about or foreseen your reply.
> Conversations came to resemble the conversations you have with a non player character in a video game, a scripted robotic simulation of actual conversation, or the conversations on a help line with an unhelpful third world help line worker to whom English is a second language, and who is reading from a script, a script written by a man whose native tongue is English, but his script is designed to deal with certain common problems that do not in the slightest resemble the problem you have with the product, because the man writing her script did not foresee your problem.