"If child porn is illegal, then why aren't guns" is a take I never thought I'd see in the wild, let alone published by a news outlet.
archive.ph/rkkJo
archive.ph/rkkJo
Follow
@cyberanathema It makes sense
CP is not something that involves any direct harm in viewing or distributing, but it's restricted anyway under the justification that it has further externalities, a case you *could* (wrongly) make for guns
If you can void the constitution to ban a form of media, you can void the constitution to ban a type of weapon
