Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀 @alyx@gameliberty.club

Imagine just how desperate the HL fandom is, that someone felt the need to make this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lufx42TyaE

@TheAncestor
I only approve of BBC (big black cock).

FINALLY found it... SBC (single board computer).

I always forget that 3 letter abbreviation for Raspberry Pi type computer on board things.

@icedquinn @TheMadPirate @coyote @pasture
>silly reasons
Their reason is that they can't be bothered to design actual cooling solutions. Again, they literally can't even put a cooling fan where it's supposed to be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiCBYAP_Sgg

@TheMadPirate @icedquinn @pasture
They're still a lot more standardized than anything else out there. And with their M1 MacBook chips, they're proving they're still interested in restricting freedom and variety as much as possible.

@Nonetrix @s8n
Intel is usually more shitty, and excludes tech from their low tier components, even if it has been available on their higher tier ones for ages.

@s8n @Nonetrix
My CPU might not support the pass-through it seems. That's what I get for being a poor euro fag and not upgrading my system in a long time.

@Nonetrix
I rarely trust random internet scripts, I'd definitely do it manually too. Not sure if I want to bother though. Also, not sure my CPU supports this, since it's kinda old. I'm searching right now to see.

@Nonetrix
Not really willing to patch roms/drivers, but otherwise I guess I could do it. Question though, do I need to have the monitor hooked up to a different card than the one that is being passed through? Or can it be the same one?

@Nonetrix
Oh, so you are running Windows itself inside a VM. Ok then. BTW, what VM software is that?

@Nonetrix
The way I understood it, wsl isn't a VM though. I never got to use it myself, as I left Windows before it became a thing, so maybe I'm wrong...

@user @TheMadPirate
Agree. The picture doesn't come even close to the cringe potential of the text version.

@icedquinn @user @pasture
Not to mention that the way our vision works, we can easily spot things at a glance, and we rarely properly read each and every item.
And shit, even if it's the first time opening a brand new program, I still know I'm not gonna find random tool A by looking in the File or Help menus. Again, we use a lot more sophisticated "algorithms" that eliminated any O(n) from the start.

We're not computers, stop trying to create UIs that the math says it should work. Make UI that real life testing shows it works.

@user
This works quite nicely too.

@icedquinn @user @pasture
I haven't mastered Photoshop or Gimp. But I know that if I want a blur, I'll probably find it in Filters menu. I already eliminated a large number of possibilities. And if I try out any other picture editing software, and want a blur, if I see a Filters menu, that's the first place I'll look.

So much for O(n).

@icedquinn @pasture
Everyone is a retard at something. Get used to it.

@icedquinn @user @pasture
>a randomly ordered list which requires O(n) search
And this is why you fail. A human being is not a computer. We don't search through menus like a computer would. If you know what the software does, you'll already have a good chance of knowing in what menu you can find a particular option you're searching for. After you used the same menu a couple of times, you'll already have an instinctual knowledge of where (top, middle, bottom) you can find something in the menu. After a lot of using the same things, you'll know almost exactly where it is. You don't do O(n) over and over again.