Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀 @alyx@gameliberty.club

@crunklord420 @Philoxenus @alyx @dave I think your interpretation, and the interpretation of all the random libs who cite the paradox of tolerance, is wrong.

The gestalt of the argument that people miss is that when you say "the interant cannot be tolerated and must be removed by force", the intolerant has a specific, inflexible definition that is required for this to be a paradox in the first place.

An intolerant man is not a man who says trannies are bad.
An intolerant man is not a man who says transitioning should be illegal.
An intolerant man is not even a man who seeks to build a political platform on the basis of rounding up the trannies.

An intolerant man is a man who meets tolerant (non-violent) opposition to his ideas with violence.

This is the actual explanation for the paradox, from Karl Popper, and not some random twitter retard, and it's information everyone already intuitively knows when it comes to other topics, such as pacifism. If a society attempts to maximize some trait, and that very trait can be exploited by an enemy to destroy that society, then no successful state can maximize that trait, by definition.

Guys I know I said I would stop but I think I have a problem