Fuentes isn't right. We started increasing the age of consent from 7 years old (!) to 14+ starting 1885. An English journalist wrote an expose on how it was legal to buy children, take them to brothels, drug them, and rape them. This inspired change. Feminism came decades after.

There's a case to be made that first wave feminism helped push this along (the suffragette movement was a little bit after this and coincided its appearance in the United States), but it's more that once the industrial revolution happened, we no longer needed to marry children to each other the very nanosecond they hit puberty.

@josh Fuentes is right. You're mixing up an English event with America, and the solution to that is obviously just make prostitution illegal.

>we no longer needed to marry children to each other the very nanosecond they hit puberty
You don't *need* to have anything, it's just objectively better. No sexual history, very hierarchical, very moldable and trainable, more fertile and attractive, and there's been no opportunity to poison them before they're already in a happy relationship.

They're very open about the fact they want to delay marriage too. When you have two populations competing the age at which you have kids acts as a multiplier.

This is something that was universally accepted through all of human history. Why would jewish morality be right about this one thing?