"Children cannot understand sex. What's that? Prove it? I don't have to prove it."
I really overestimated zoophiles.
I really overestimated zoophiles.
@applejack That actually isn't true. You can prove a negative. What you cannot do is disprove an unfalsifiable negative.
@miria Prove there's never been an example of a child being aroused. Can't. Relative to his retarded normie brain its fair to assume it doesn't exist without being given an example, which is very easy to give
I get the strategy of not playing along with retarded requests, but in this case it's retarded because it's so incredibly easy and damaging to just post:
Consistent with our findings, masturbation has been reported to start in most children before 2 years of age .
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47718104_Infantile_and_early_childhood_masturbation_Sex_hormones_and_clinical_profile
@applejack Yes you can very easily prove that. You find a child being aroused. That proves your claim false.
@miria Yes, good job agreeing with me. Tell me how you prove it true now
@applejack You can't prove true something that's false. That's not the same as not being able to prove a negative, which is not true. If I say "my shirt isn't red", I can prove that by looking at my shirt and seeing it's blue.
