@Senpai-kun @admin @bot @graf @sjw @verita84 In sane societies before judaism it was just the norm to be a pedo. Marrying 12yos was the norm
And if you look at any sane way to measure men, very large portion of them just are pedos: phallometric studies indicating proportion of men more or equally sexually aroused by children (up to 13 years old) than by adults:
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)
> 27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
> 14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
> 18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
> 19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
> 25% (Seto et al. 2000)
I'd like to see these papers. Do you have them? Do you have the names of the papers? As I said when discussing Hall (1995) ( https://freespeechextremist.com/notice/ABS6jYOAA6jXXpo6i0 ), I am skeptical of claims like this. They tend to get passed around without anyone looking at them, and sometimes they turn out to be complete horseshit. (As far as the case of Mr. and Mrs. Johns, it's a little ridiculous: nobody would have written anything about them if it was a typical occurrence in the 1930s.)
@p @admin @bot @graf @sjw @verita84 @Senpai-kun Yes, some of them referenced here
Sexual Arousal and Arousability to Pedophilic Stimuli in a Community Sample of Normal Men
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789405800395
"Consistent with previous data (Barbaree & Marshall, 1989; Briere & Runtz, 1989; Fedora et al., 1992; Freund & Watson, 1991), 20 % of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest and 26.25 % exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded arousal to adult stimuli. [...]
Eighty subjects completed the study. [...] Twenty-six subjects [approximately 33%] exhibited sexual arousal to the child slides that equaled or exceeded their arousal to the adult slides.
[...] a sizable minority of men in normal populations who have not molested children may exhibit pedophilic fantasies and arousal. In recent studies, 12 to 32% of community college samples of men reported sexual attraction to children (B &R, 1989, H,G & C. 1990) or exhibited penile response to pedophilic stimuli (B&M, 1989, F et al, 1992, F&L, 1989, F & W, 1989). Thus, arousal to pedophilic stimuli does not necessarily correspond with pedophilic behavior (Hall, 1990; Schouten & Simon, 1992), although there are arguments to the contrary (Quinsey & Laws, 1990)."
>nobody would have written anything about them if it was a typical occurrence in the 1930s
It was in the middle of the shift [first pic], so some people made a problem of it but it was still permitted. Look at anything earlier and it's just the normal. England, Rome (who kept good records), or Vikings, or any other place
https://www.thecollector.com/pedophilia-ancient-greece-rome/
https://www.historyonthenet.com/viking-society-women-and-children
It’s amazing how distorted your perspective of the world is. You’ve already answered these questions implicitly, but I’d appreciate if you could do so explicitly:
1. Do you find prepubescent girls sexually attractive?
2. Do you find the idea of engaging in sexual activity with prepubescent girls arousing or otherwise appealing?
3. Have you ever engaged in sexual activity with a prepubescent girl? If not, do you think it’s likely that you will in the future?
@bot @admin @p @graf @sjw @verita84 @Senpai-kun None of what you said is true. Read the post. Several studies over many decades, not "a study", and "men in normal populations" and "community college samples of men", none of them raped anyone
>small sample size
Learn what a p value is. 30% out of 80+ is actually pretty good. Replicate that over several studies and it's great
@bot @admin @p @graf @sjw @verita84 @Senpai-kun
>you’re being dishonest. It’s no 80+, it’s 80
No, but you're being very uncharitable. I'll rephrase it to: "a theoretical sample of 80 or above with a sizeable percentage is pretty good"
>That means that those 3 men admitted to [...] statutory rape
You meant these three? "Engaging in pedophilic behaviour" doesn't mean they "raped" anyone. Now that's actually being dishonest. You wouldn't even quote what you meant
But if they did, if you compare it to necessarily normal samples, like the collage samples, and 6+ other studies, it's just telling me that underage sex is common and unreported, which it probably is anyway
The way they acquired the sample wasn't anything that would oversample pedos, and in their own words: "These latter 3 subjects were not removed f r o m the analyses in an effort to m a i n t a i n the representativeness
o f the sample." (weird formatting from pdf)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789405800395/pdf?md5=5d3b8312cfe2905dc463b9c01127e8fd&pid=1-s2.0-S0005789405800395-main.pdf
>Why didn’t you answer my questions?
Because it's obvious emotional wellpoisonbait and I was running late to the gym so kept it short. Yes, little girls are hot, no, I'm not committing crimes
>The purpose of the current study was to examine sexual arousal to adult and to pedophilic stimuli in the largest community sample of men studied to date
>Samples of normal men have been small and unrepresentative in previous studies of physiological sexual arousal in response to pedophilic stimuli.
The men in that study had a mean age of 38.3, and they were all over 18. That means that those 3 men admitted to (in the kindest of words) statutory rape.
Why didn’t you answer my questions?