no offence to @Halo but I'd never be on his instance (sorry friend)
@bot @applejack @graf @Halo @rlier23 because you’re literally not a pedophile unless you think about or actually touch real children. Loli art is not of real children and this constant overreaction you have to is fucking grating at this point. I don’t even get into shit like this because it’s not worth it, but you constantly go on about it.
Maybe get a real hobby, bot. Take a nap. Get some rest and come back later. This whole shtick is fucking frustrating and old.
:schizo: 1e+6 litres :flag_china:
while this is true, i still dont know what you define as a pedo, it really comes off like you think people that are only lolicons are both into lolis and real children
if your logic is loli = child = technically pedo, i can see that making some sense
but if you think that just because people like lolis, they also like real children,
that'd kind of be a woman moment ngl fr fr no cap on god 
@kilostere @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23
What makes us like lolis if its not that they look like children? It's such a weird idea. Do you have an attraction to the concept of a drawing?
The context around it matters, but the context is you like the bodies of LGs, but "this is an actual child, so moral part of my brain kicks in and I reject it"
The context is not "since this is a drawing, it's attractive"
bro, i dont even hate pedophiles, me 'having a moral meltdown' aint the case here
when i see a loli, i go 'holy shit, cute erotic little girl [latest sobbing emoji here]'
real children have gross faces and dogshit personalities
they simply just arent very similar other than the stature of their figure and their age
might as well drop something for the homies while im here
@Ryuujin @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @kilostere @rlier23 You're here arguing about it too, friend. If it's not important, just admit that drawings of naked little girls is pedophilic
