I noticed a lot of the youjo motherfuckers haven't been liking my shit after I blocked one of those guys for straight up saying "there is nothing wrong with being a pedophile."

Like unironically he said that

@Terry There is nothing wrong with being a pedophile

@applejack saying, unironically, "there is nothing wrong with being a pedophile" is equivalent to saying "there is nothing wrong with being a rapist" or "there is nothing wrong with being a killer" insofar as the only people who genuinely believe that there is "nothing wrong" therein are those who suffer the compulsion or affliction--either from the perspective that they cannot help being born or having developed such tendencies OR that asserting there is "nothing wrong", in a Machiavellian sense, strategically places them within closer accessibility to their would-be prey

and, the word "prey" is quite definitely what it is. the entire rest of society *defensively* vilifies and hates pedophiles for the same reason they vilify and hate rapists or killers: because, by their very nature, pedophiles (et al.) are *predators* against the rest of the citizenry; they represent a danger or a threat to others and their loved ones

are you born a pedophile? can you not help your inclinations or neurology? in most cases that probably *is* the case, and there is nothing *morally* wrong with that so long as one recognizes the deviance, does not act upon it, and seeks help. we should not demonize people for things outside of their control. it *is* wrong from an amoral, empirical evolutionary view--i.e.: humans are not meant to be attracted to prepubescent children. it is wrong in the same way a manufacturing defect on a part of machine would be wrong. it's "incorrect" or faulty. it's "wrong" in precisely the same way that homosexuality is "wrong", regardless of morality

but to say "there is nothing wrong with being a pedophile" in the sense that, proudly, one does not think there is anything perverse or blackhearted in trying to fuck a child, then such a statement is simply the gloat of a predator.

@Terry

@knhy @Terry Being a rapist or killer is an action, pedophilia is an attraction, and anyone can make up this meme

"Being a racist is just like being a murderer"

Society in general also vilifies racists, btw. People never saw pedos as a threat until media hysteria, same as racism

Age of consent in the US in 1880 was 7-12

Get something better

>humans are not meant to be attracted to prepubescent children
Wrong. Monopolising them before puberty is advantageous when you're monogamous, then their entire sexual life is yours

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J056v16n02_03

@knhy @Terry Btw

proportion of men more or equally sexually aroused by children (up to 13 years old) than by adults:
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)

In this study men rated female faces about 13 years old the most attractive
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237004330_Facial_Olfactory_and_Vocal_Cues_to_Female_Reproductive_Value

The BMI men find the most attractive is about 17-20 which is the typical BMI for girls about 13

Guess why girls we're generally married at 12-16 historically
https://www.thecollector.com/pedophilia-ancient-greece-rome/
https://www.historyonthenet.com/viking-society-women-and-children

@applejack @knhy lol literally a paper written by jews
image.png

@Terry @applejack @knhy I wonder who owns all the media that says pedo = bad

@bsdloli @applejack @knhy
for now they call it bad. But the point of these "peer reviewed" studies is to slowly normalize it just like they did with trannys

@Terry @applejack @knhy then there wouldn't be any reasons as to why they even decided to lobby for age of consent laws and "children rights" lmao

@bsdloli @Terry @knhy They literally can't even address the fact it was historically normal