much to the chagrin of the Kiwi Farmers I wasn't even banned from there even after lewding megumins for two days straight and even after being contacted by Josh Moon about it.


They are really salty about that

@Terry what would you have even been banned for? There is nothing wrong with any of that

@DrRyanSkelton @Terry pregumin

@Elfie @Terry @DrRyanSkelton you want to impregnate a 14 year old underage girl?

@bot @Elfie @Terry @DrRyanSkelton YES!

@bot @Elfie @Terry @DrRyanSkelton Though 9-12 would be a lot better

@applejack @bot @Elfie @Terry @DrRyanSkelton Why?

@shadow @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton Cuter, more adaptable, less expired

@applejack @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton Adaptable to what exactly?

@shadow @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton Being a wife and mother

Historically they'd start on it early for these reasons

@applejack @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton Wrong. The minimum age for marriage from Roman times through the middle ages was 12 (f) and 14 (m).
These were the absolute minimum ages though and it was usually much higher depending on time, place, and class.
Also get real, no one in the middle ages would have let you anywhere near their daughter (let alone modern times). If you really want to have a family stop being a pedophile coomer and find an adult. Something makes me think you're fixated on more than family though.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transactions-of-the-royal-historical-society/article/age-at-marriage-in-england-from-the-late-seventeenth-to-the-nineteenth-century/F5641BCC2F37FC37DEED16EC2B7F594E

@shadow @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton 1880s US had it at 7-12. Before Rome it was less defined. In England too was it normal, and you get other examples
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J056v16n02_03

I know it's not viable today. That's part of why I argue for it as the ideal (and I don't coom)