If there's one thing AnComs do better than AnCaps, it's technology.
And I'm just one of the minority AnCaps that knows technology.
AnComs have a lot free time as well. Most of their work are just forks or university projects.
They have an issue btw, they really sck doing standards or doing big scale collaboration. Most of their projects ends with several conflicts and forks each other. They ain’t good accepting criticism, they lack good leadership because they don’t believe in hierarchy.
For example, which successful project have been made by anarcho commies?
OpenBSD? Theo de Raadt isn’t commie for sure.
GNU? Met Stallman a year ago with some Mises colleges, he’s not communist, def. not a globohomo corporation supporter. Most commies wanted to get him out of GNU.
LibreSSL? Maybe, but it’s a mostly dead project, it breaks most software.
FreeBSD? Maybe, but their internal discussions are brainlet and they hate themselves. https://web.archive.org/web/20180213113526/https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html
I can’t think in any other project.
@waltercool @ryo The biggest project I can think of that's very explicitly commie is 9front, which isn't exactly useful, and falls under a fork, a fork of a binary instead of source even
