Show newer

@realcaseyrollins @matrix Well, if a woman's not pregnant, she's not very "fertile", is she?

@matrix There is some physical strain from it, so she might be less fertile, but that's probably a much lesser thing

@matrix I don't see why thatðs a disagreement. I said "without kids" for that reason

@realcaseyrollins @matrix Yes, but also no. She's even more fertile since her entire fertility can be yours if you wait

Thinking of it as a bad thing is akin to complaining about a woman because shes not pregnant *yet*

Also, if I wanted to post a pre-teen tummy I would have. I think shes like 14 or something

@matrix I think its actually probably a little simpler. Men just overall love flat healthy stomachs because it shows you're young, without kids, and so fertile, and abs are a form of that

@Ricotta Argue with what? It's lines on google earth. Look at the ocean and ships disappear bottom up, they don't become dots

@salt Its part of how they work. Nobody actually gets convinced by them, they just call themselves popular and the newest generation falls for it. Always been this way

@vaas@pawoo.net @miria Just throwing your hands up and exclaiming "I guess they're all just dumb! There's no explanation for it!" is retarded when they're obviously being purposeful

@miria The exact same thing happened with a weed study authorised by some US president I don't remember.

It's talked about on this one or one of the nearby ones
youtube.com/watch?v=O5jEKaAwdF

@miria Remember when the WHO is still pushing circumcision stud{y,ies} (with jewish authors) that amounted to academic fraud

europepmc.org/article/med/2232
Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: methodological, ethical and legal concerns

In 2007, WHO/UNAIDS recommended male circumcision as an HIV-preventive measure based on three sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials (RCTs) into female-to-male sexual transmission. A related RCT investigated male-to-female transmission. However, the trials were compromised by inadequate equipoise; selection bias; inadequate blinding; problematic randomisation; trials stopped early with exaggerated treatment effects; and not investigating non-sexual transmission. Several questions remain unanswered. Why were the trials carried out in countries where more intact men were HIV-positive than in those where more circumcised men were HIV-positive? Why were men sampled from specific ethnic subgroups? Why were so many participants lost to follow-up? Why did men in the male circumcision groups receive additional counselling on safe sex practices? While the absolute reduction in HIV transmission associated with male circumcision across the three female-to-male trials was only about 1.3%, relative reduction was reported as 60%, but, after correction for lead-time bias, averaged 49%. In the Kenyan trial, male circumcision appears to have been associated with four new incident infections. In the Ugandan male-to-female trial, there appears to have been a 61% relative increase in HIV infection among female partners of HIV-positive circumcised men. Since male circumcision diverts resources from known preventive measures and increases risk-taking behaviours, any long-term benefit in reducing HIV transmission remains uncertain.

Wikipedia also pushes it without criticism or counterpoint

@Ricotta I'll take the priestess wife. No racemixing for me, thanks

@miria @matrix But likes on twitter depend on what other leftists think. It's true, but the origin for their opinions is just jewry, media, celebrities, tv, universities, that make up retarded justifications and propagate them

You can tell it's programmed because they pick whatever excuse is convenient, and they themselves can't even think past it. Guns, vaccine, public well-being. Faggot aids, abortion, my body my choice. Just conveniently to the benefit of jewry

If it was actually organic you'd see them argue about it based on stances, but they don't

@matrix I mean, they didn't do this in American History X and nobody in the movie had a response to it

@PinhasLavon @mactonite@neckbeard.xyz @Shadowman311 Neither of those are wrong, but at least one of them's a crime

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.