What is the correct way?
type *ptr is the only correct way and if you disagree you're wrong
@nil It's a "type pointer" that's called "ptr", not a "type" that's called "pointer to ptr". The pointer is part of the datatype, you rart.
type* ptr;
Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.
@nil It's a "type pointer" that's called "ptr", not a "type" that's called "pointer to ptr". The pointer is part of the datatype, you rart.
type* ptr;