STOP BEING NICE TO PEOPLE WHO ANNOY YOU
IF SOMEONE ANNOYS YOU, AND THEY WON'T STOP, AND THEY KEEP ANNOYING YOU, MAKE A THREAT!!
IF THEY KEEP ANNOYING YOU, FOLLOW THROUGH ON THE THREAT!
IF THEY KEEP ANNOYING YOU, INCREASE THE SEVERITY OF YOUR RESPONSE!
YOU'RE WELCOME, STOP GETTING RAPED.

IT CAN BE AS SIMPLE AS SPREADING A RUMOR, YOUR THREAT COULD BE THAT YOU WILL TELL EVERYONE BAD SHIT ABOUT THEM.
IT COULD BE A LIE, A SIMPLE "I KNOW WHAT YOU DID", INSINUATING YOU KNOW MORE THAN YOU DO, A GOOD POKER FACE CAN SCARE SOMEONE SHITLESS.
AND IF THEY CAN'T HANDLE THE BANTZ AND PUT YOU IN A SELF DEFENSE SITUATION, JUMP WITH JOY, BECAUSE YOU NOW HAVE FREE LEASE!

I saw someone speak about their experience being abused sexually and it made me so mad that they let it happen, because they didn't have the confidence to stop it. It wasn't violent it was manipulation. So I want ALL OF YOU TO HAVE THE CONFIDENCE TO STOP IT! I WANT ALL OF YOU TO HAVE THE COOD BLOOD NECESSARY TO STAND UP TO TYRANNY, NO MATTER THE FORM IT TAKES, SMALL OR LARGE, BIG OR LITTLE, SMASH IT WITH ALL THE LEGAL MEANS AT YOUR DISPOSAL, SHOW NO MERCY, SHOW NO REMORSE, MAKE THEM CRY, MAKE THEM POUT, MAKE THEM STOMP THEIR FEET, AND PRAY THEY THROW A PUNCH SO YOU CAN BITE THEIR FUCKING FINGERS OFF WHO CARES IF YOU DIE IN THE PROCESS BITE THOSE FUCKING FINGERS OFF AND GOUGE THOSE FUCKING EYES, DEEP GOUGE, GOUGE, HOOK, AND RIP, GOUGE, HOOK, AND RIP!!!!!

@clora It's all fun and games until the discard. Narcissists always discard. If you're doing things you don't want to do because you think it'll get you love, and then the love never comes, that's painful.

@Jazzy_Butts the person who was abusing me eventually strangled me half to death & i ended up heading to the ER w/ a minor brain injury
im totally fine now, but yeah, that one played itself out
tbh though most of the people who conditioned me to conflate emotional abuse and affection in the way I do now couldn't fairly be characterized as narcissists, & certainly didn't "discard" me in most cases in that sense

@clora The discard is emotional not literal, first comes love bombing, then devaluation, then abuse, and finally discard.

@Jazzy_Butts lmao if anyone is love-bombing and discarding in my relationships it's me, that tends to be my response to adverse relationships rather than the nature of them

@clora Interesting, how would you characterize your abusive partners? You said they're not narcissistic, so what were they?

@Jazzy_Butts @clora Humans are extremely complex, and human interactions even more so. Unfortunately, this means there are a huge number of ways one person can abuse another, and they aren't always straightforward enough to fit neatly into the categories we've made.

Our categories and narratives outline common trends and general warning signs to look for, and those are a useful first-order approximation of the world, but ultimately individual interactions need to be accounted for individually, and at that point trying to squish the situation into a specific label rather than dealing directly with the situation does more harm than good.
@formication @Jazzy_Butts george box voice some models are wrong and some models are wronger
@formication @Jazzy_Butts also specific behavioral patterns categorized for clinical purposes don't actually define a specific pattern of abuse. a vast array of different particular instantiations can arise from the same underlying behavioral dysfunction, even if we were to treat that as invariant across individuals, which it isn't

@clora @formication See my longer post. I get it, I just disagree. What is a moment? What is a person? What is time? We do not have answers, yet it is not useless to grasp regardless, at defining and making sense of the world.

@Jazzy_Butts @formication this is fucking retarded
taxonomic categories exist to describe trends, they aren't universals or some sort of transcendental category from which things proceed
telling someone to apply a specific descriptive label as a prescriptive interpretive tool over their own life events is just a category mistake. you're using the tool for the wrong thing.

@clora @formication You know that if you can't explain something simply, you don't really understand it yourself, you're just arguing to argue, imo

@Jazzy_Butts @formication labels describe a class of things. a class of things doesn't capture all attributes of its inhabitants.
therefore, using that class as a tool for analysis of the form/structure of a concrete thing that is chaotic, i.e. wherein small perturbations lead to significant outward changes, is a mistake if one claims anything more complex than that the concrete thing has membership in the class.
this is not a complicated idea and if you can't wrap your head around it there's nothing i can do to help you.

@clora @formication You could use metaphor and allegory but you are too emotionally and/or imaginatively incompetent. No offense.

@Jazzy_Butts @clora

I'll take a stab at it.

When looking at large amounts of data, finding trends can be helpful. When you're looking at individual situations, insisting on fitting them to the trends leaves out a lot of information. And in those individual situations, sometimes that information really matters.

Imagine there's a cat that's missing a leg. Insisting on labeling any given abuser as a narcissist (and from there making assumptions about their personality or behavior) is the equivalent of looking at the animal, saying, "Besides the missing leg, that looks like a cat, so it falls into the category of cat," and then saying, "This creature is a cat, and cats have four legs, therefore this creature must have four legs."
Follow

@formication @clora I see now, I didn't mean to imply the very specific meanings I think you're seeing were...I don't think we define these terms the same way, I think every human being is a narcissist except for those with... different brains, unusual brains, downies and such, everyone else has a streak, what I mean to say when I say narcissism, is, overly codependent, overly controlling, overly agressive, all these things could be caused by completely opposite circumstances in two individuals, and also the word "overly" is very vague, because as said there is a lot of grey out there in the world, and so when I say someone is a "narcissist" I mean that they are OVERLY narcissistic, they are so narcissistic that it leads them to commit paterns of abuse, consciously or subconsciously, and I know that everyones morals and perceptions are different, and so what one considers abuse another may consider helpful or kind. Locking someone up in a ward for example. Some see this as unacceptable, a violation of consent. Others see consent as irrelevant when it comes to behavioral "correction". Who is right? Well there is no god, there is no right or wrong, these things are metaphorical, everything is simply nothing more than taste. If I say rape is evil, and evil does not really exist, I obviously mean to say "rape, to me, is distasteful" (so distasteful in fact that it drives violent impulses in my mind), but to say that it is literally evil would be wrong. It is metaphorically evil, meaning that I find it distasteful. People who know what they do is "evil", they only know that others find it distasteful, they wouldn't have done what they did if they themselves had, in that moment, found it distasteful as well. So I don't believe in the tragic victim monster who couldn't help themselves, I see only humans and monsters, my sympathy for violators has dried up.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.