apparently the UN is trying to tell judges not to enforce age of consent laws now.

:blobcatpuffyfearful: well'p.
@icedquinn i saw a screenshot of it, it may be a misinterpretation.
@thendrix @Moon AJ read the text out on air on the 21st and it outright says judges should not rule on 'discriminatory' factors like age
Follow

@icedquinn @Moon @thendrix You know it's not for anything good like child rights or anything, *I* personally bet it's then preempting all the people who are going to be outed connected to Epstein because that shits not going away, nothing the elite does is altruistic, it's always self interest

Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in consensual sexual conduct and their right to be heard in matters concerning them. Pursuant to their evolving capacities and progressive autonomy, persons under 18 years of age should participate in decisions affecting them, with due regard to their age, maturity and best interests, and with specific attention to non-discrimination guarantees.

I think the main reason they push sex change consent in the US is to push sex consent, and from there sex work. How do I know this? I listen to what they say and read what they write. :shrugz:

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.