I have just realized how stupid the entire "consencual" argument is when talking about homosexuality.
Yes, conscent is a necessity, but it if far from a proper argument.
But I love the fact that the entire debate is based about a legal definition of conscent, that can be changed overnight to invalidate any argumentation about pedofilia or even rape.
And they WILL use this oportunity. If I were to guess what word is gonna be deformed by the left next, that is the target.
@ChristiJunior
Fuck... That makes a total sense. Thanks for filling in the missing piece for me.
If children can consent to genital mutilation, it becomes easy to argue that they can also consent to genital stimulation.