@freemo I hope you mean well, but if you are afraid to say with conviction something as vague as all lives matter just because bunch of idiots don't think so, there is your problem.

If you have ANY conviction you are sure about, you have to say it. Ignoring non-black lives while looking at racial tensions is exactly how things got this bad.

@LukeAlmighty I'm a little confused by the way you worded your response "if you are afraid to say with conviction something as vague as all lives matte" .. are you saying I shouldnt be afraid to say all lives matter? or that because im afraid to say all lives matter I might have bad intentions, or are you saying that if i say all lives matter it might suggest I have bad intentions?

can you please rephrase your response so I can understand.

@freemo
Say what you believe, especially if you see someone else suppressing that truth.

Yes, by most accepted definitions of morality ALL lives matter. If you're only focusing on problems of one group, you will only create more tension. Inevitably and always.

@LukeAlmighty Then we agree.

I do not disagree with the idea or phrase "all lives matter", the issue is that as a motto it was hijacked and corrupted as early on when that phrase became a motto for a movement it was used largely in opposition of BLM rather than as a movement in its own right. So the phrase got tainted by that. The meaning of the phrase still has value but sadly its likely to cause issues.

I feel "Lives Matter" means virtually the same thing, but has none of that taint. Also if anyone tries to turn it into something negative it is easy to point out the intention transition from "All Lives Matter" to "Lives Matter" as a way to show compassion and address that negative connotation thus disarming the criticism against it to some degree.

@freemo We do not agree, and do not even try such gaslighting again.

First: All lives matter is the proper response to someone ignoring problems of most of population.

Second: If there are people who are willing to ignore problems of significant parts of population, it's important to resist their attempts at ruining more lives.

Third: BLM is a terrorist organisation, that causes nothing but escalation of racial tension.

And finally: Saying that because bunch of terrorists don't like a phrase because that phrase includes people other then them is a proper reason to give up a phrase that has a cultural significance and is both truthful and complete is in my opinion the definition of moral weakness.

It would be both immoral and strategycally retarded to do so.

@LukeAlmighty Your last message before this one we did agree, it wasnt gas lighting. The things you stated in that message were all statements that on their surface I agreed with. dont be a pompass ass.

Now this message which I am replying to now.. we agree on point 1 as stated (though as I said Lives Matter is likely more tactful and means the same thing), but otherwise either response, since they both mean the same thing, is entierly appropriate in my mind

to point 2, we also agree.

to point 3, no we dont agree there. BLM is not organized. People who have used that banner have acted as terrorists, others have not (and even decried those who did at times).

Your final point becomes moot since we dont agree on the third point.

@freemo ok, if you need it spelled out:

'Lives matter' implies 'some' not 'all', so, the statement is not COMPLETE.

And for the second joke you inserted in your argument, you reversed some and all again. Enough of BLM activists are aggressive towards white people for me to see them as a representative of that group.

There are peaceful people in every group you can think of, so I don't really care to argue about percentages while anti-white riots are going on...

@LukeAlmighty what about "lives matter" implies only some? .. but ok, Ic an easily meet your demand. You would then presumably be ok if the phrase used is "Every Life Matters"?

@freemo
I would still consider it morally and strategically retarded to give up the momentum because of a few bigots, AND, it will receive exactly the same arguments against it as all lives matter.

But yeah, at least it won't be as easy to turn this phrase to another discrimination tool.

But still be careful with this crusade of yours. Bigots LOVE to deform definitions. Diversity didn't always mean everyone except white males you know...