@toast @LukeAlmighty @aetios it's filled with a lot of wellmeaning volunteers though, it's not just wikipedia but the commons and wiktionary etc
@LukeAlmighty @aetios @toast that stuff gets a lot of disproportionate attention, most articles on wikipedia are just random things devoid of incentive to edit war
@georgia @aetios @toast
As I wrote above, I know and I do apreciace wikipedia for most topics.
The question is, if such a page is dangerous, when most people don't realize, that for political topics, you cannot get worse of a source of information.
And the politics is just the first example I know of, I have no idea how many topics are spread in their most biased way to the masses.
That is why I am seriously questioning the total damage caused by the page.
