Edward from Twilight is so hot.
The same skank that says that convicted rapists sho be given lenient sentences.
@thebitchisback @LukeAlmighty @alex
She suggests that, if we want to rely on the victim’s statement that she did not give consent as sufficient – and not insist on a beyond reasonable doubt standard – then sentences for rape could be reduced to recognise a lower standard of proof. “It is the savagery of the sentence that pushes juries toward extending the benefit of the doubt.”
Advocates for rapists.
Condones rape and pretend to call itself a feminist.
Flippant, hypocrisy, is the pillar of Germaine Greer entire life.
I'm not here to defend Greer but it's true. Community service sucks and I'd rather do jail tbh.
In any case, Greer's main point seems to be that there might be a difference between the Night Stalker/Jack the Ripper rape and "What? You're changing your mind now?" rape.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/may/30/germaine-greer-calls-for-punishment-for-to-be-reduced
Me too was described be her as quote on quote, "whinging." Or her depiction of how ALL females should respond to males, “always wanted to see women react immediately” to the threat of harassment or rape. Justifying it, in all contexts and condoning the behaviour of rapists.
“what makes it different is when the man has economic power, as Harvey Weinstein has”, Greer said that “if you spread your legs because he said ‘be nice to me and I’ll give you a job in a movie’ then I’m afraid that’s tantamount to consent, and it’s too late now to start whingeing about that”
Hahahaha
A male, in a position of power is Scott free to do as he pleases, it's consent.
“My feeling is we ditch rape altogether [as a crime] because it’s hopeless."
Says someone who was supposedly raped haha
"I have seen the police working up a rape case trying desperately hard to build it up so it will stand up in court – and wasting their time,” she said. “The burden of proof is too high and that’s because the tariff is too onerous. Rape is a daily crime, it’s not spectacular. What we need is a coherent law of sexual assault."
Seriously, halulz.
Less than 10% of reported rapes end up in court and less than 1% end up in a conviction.
Daily crime, underrated response and lack of judicial support.
Wannabe feminist, sluts, like Germaine. Need hung up by their useless, cobweb riddled flaps.
@thebitchisback @Lonewanderer @LukeAlmighty @alex
“I have seen the police working up a rape case trying desperately hard to build it up so it will stand up in court – and wasting their time,” she said. “The burden of proof is too high and that’s because the tariff is too onerous. Rape is a daily crime, it’s not spectacular. What we need is a coherent law of sexual assault.”
What we need is a coherent law of sexual assault.”
@PonyPanda @thebitchisback @alex @Lonewanderer
If women can argue for this long about what is or is not rape, then how the fuck do you expect men to accept a chance of loosing their entire lifes as a result?
Less than 10% of ALL reported rapes, make it to court. 90% are dismissed, regardless of evidence. Point blank.
Of the 10% taken to court, less than 1% get a conviction recorded.
Do the math.
@thebitchisback @PonyPanda @alex @Lonewanderer
I did. It is MY ENTIRE FUCKING LIFE for something you fags cannot even clearly define. Fuck you, you deserve the rape, if you don't care about lives of the good men out there.
Hahahaha
Where the fuck in my posts, does it denote that I'm against the patriarchy?
Was it when I said useless feminists should be hung up by their useless, cobweb riddled flaps?
Or something else, I said?
Who's the fag here, exactly?
If you're crying about potentially, being locked up for raping some female/s, that's on you, alone.
Sounds like a guilty conscience.
@thebitchisback @PonyPanda @alex @Lonewanderer
Tell me.
Do women ever cry genuinely, or is it all just a show for a camera?
Tell me.
Why do you consider yourself a man, when you're a weak piece of shit, that doesn't deserve the title of man?
It is it all just a show, for fedi?
@thebitchisback @PonyPanda @alex @Lonewanderer
*unironically thinking I care about approval of some spinster
Name calling is useless here. The only way you could make it less effective would be to show your fat 60year old face.
Hahahahaha
Incel got dropped on its head, obviously.
@thebitchisback @PonyPanda @alex @Lonewanderer
And obviously, if you still believe being incel is the worst fate a man can encounter, you have never seen a miror.
Wew lad wew
You just posted Jew links to your favourite Hollywood, wishlist, lover.
Hahahahaa
Halulz
If rape definition gets expanded all you get is people no longer caring about rape. Expand the definition and I will treat every claim as bullshit.
@PonyPanda @thebitchisback @alex @Lonewanderer
> hung up by their useless, cobweb riddled flaps
LOLZ.gif
@thebitchisback @PonyPanda @alex @Lonewanderer
Oh no... The guy promissed me a career, and I played only in 3 ironman movies and the most expensive movie of all time... But I didn't get a main role in that one, so I will still call it a rape...
No, cunt, I didn't.
Go fuck a plushie, you poofter.
How's them rotten eggs, taste, poofter?
Enjoy them, now.
You're a reject, you pathetic, poofter hahaha
You must love Jew cock if you're posting that shit on fedi.
Halulz
Snort falafel
@thebitchisback @LukeAlmighty @alex
On Rape provides more subtleties than this bald statement. As she points out, rape often occurs without visible injuries, is rarely the stereotypical violent assault by a stranger, but is “always an evil”.
As Greer says , far too often the woman herself is unable to identify what happened as rape when the rapist is a man she knows and perhaps even loves. Not because she wasn’t violated – she most definitely was – but because women are accustomed to uncaring behaviour from men, and men are trained to dismiss empathy and thoughtfulness as unmanly.
Greer describes it as the contested ground of “giving in or giving consent” and presents a compelling argument about the conflict this presents for a criminal justice underpinned by the principles of a presumption of innocence and proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Women who have given in but not consented may not necessarily experience this rape as trauma but, as Greer says, they will always suffer damage. Perhaps part of their confusion is that this is not the narrative we give to rape victims.
Greer’s efforts to demystify rape and explore the wide variety of circumstances and responses to rape is not doing victims a disservice. It opens discussion to include women who aren’t sure they’ve been raped but do know they’ve been dehumanised by partners who treated sex as an entitlement.
Her greatest failing might not be in the concepts she’s presenting but in her inability to explain herself to a generation which understands the power of words to cause harm and is fearless in its rejection of careless language. The obligation is always on the writer to convey meaning, not the reader to interpret ill-expressed ideas.
The same slag that wants to slap community service orders out for convicted rape.
Hahahaha
I think you're missing the bigger picture and the implications her proposal has. It's about a middle ground between walking scott-free and up to a decade of jail time. Unfortunately... like most people unqualified to talk about law... she confuses the roles of determining guilt with metering out justice and I disagree with her for different reasons.
What she wants is something to ensure that little Johnny Date Rapist gets *some* punishment because the courts are reluctant to pull the trigger on him with charges that put him in roughly the same category as Richard Ramirez. Especially when the type of sexual assault she's identifying is hard to prove in court.
What this means is that now the stupid "he said" "she said" bullshit that created #metoo is no longer in the domain of gossip but now expediated by the courts that will take "well if she said something happened but doesn't have proof, we're just going to slap you 200 hours community service unpaid labour for the state."
The problem is... a fake rape allegation is a frivolous thing and for the person making it... 200 hours community service burdening their victim is just as good as years in jail considering they were never "wronged" with sexual assault to begin with. And considering this whole program is predicated on the difficulty in proving lack of consent... I could say every woman that's stolen my essence has assaulted me just to spite them with 200 hours community service.
It's not a very good solution at all. But at the very least, Greer is identifying the problem that exists with "high stakes" of prosecuting rape.
That's a typical example, of a hypocritical feminist, with her OWN asinine views, that don't reflect the REAL world or judicial systems.
That slag, doesn't even believe that rape, in any terms of the complexities, it may contain etc. That the crimes committed, effect the person who's at the brunt of it and the wider community/population.
She refused to accept determination of guilt and a punishment thereof.
Inherently, flawed, useless and shouldn't ever be taken in any regards of seriousness.
Slag doesn't believe in the STATE or it's laws, basically.
What are the victims needs?
Who's obligation, does it reply upon?
Violations, create GUILT!
Penal codes, exist for a reason.
Where's the victim sensitivity training, post conviction?
Reparative boards, others than measly, criminal compensation claims?
Offender, family assistance programs?
Community safety, accountability?
He's around feminists all day. He's talking about a certain male beauty in a subversive way.
the beautiful boy.jpg