🔻🪂
@disclosetv schizos online 11 months ahead of first world bureaucracies
@TapWaterAddict @MechaSilvio @disclosetv@twtr.plus
Is it me, or do ALL the coof vaccines have the exactly same problem?
@LukeAlmighty @TapWaterAddict @MechaSilvio @disclosetv
They do, and it's because the spike protein itself is dangerous.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538446/
Studies keep confirming this and the very sincere Believers of Scientology keep promoting the mass injection of what now amounts to a biological weapon.
I had a bet with a friend some years back when by coincidence we were discussing mrna vaccines (before they were ever used on humans). I bet that one day, there'd be a virus with a spike protein that itself was dangerous, negating the "completely safe" theoretical attribute of this technique.
For most viruses this shouldn't be an issue, it just so happens that with Sars2/covid19 it is, and of course there was insufficient in vitro testing due to overconfidence that "it's just a spike protein".
Anyone used to fixing real world problems could've looked at the data 2 years ago and concluded "this is stil too risky for humans", outside of the demonstrated safe anti aging applications, producing proven-safe proteins.
I do think the technique could've become safe... the delivery mechanism was flawed. Gene therapy is coming someday, and whatever pseudo-viral delivery mechanism is used will probably also be the best delivery mechanism for MRNA based therapies so that these strands don't land in random cells all around the body.
https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/06/16/researcher-we-made-a-big-mistake-on-covid-19-vaccine/
It hit me the other day, the sheer absurdity, that someone who is technically a homeless dropout could foresee an extremely rare fail case with a bleeding edge technique like this.
They do, and it's because the spike protein itself is dangerous.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538446/
Studies keep confirming this and the very sincere Believers of Scientology keep promoting the mass injection of what now amounts to a biological weapon.
I had a bet with a friend some years back when by coincidence we were discussing mrna vaccines (before they were ever used on humans). I bet that one day, there'd be a virus with a spike protein that itself was dangerous, negating the "completely safe" theoretical attribute of this technique.
For most viruses this shouldn't be an issue, it just so happens that with Sars2/covid19 it is, and of course there was insufficient in vitro testing due to overconfidence that "it's just a spike protein".
Anyone used to fixing real world problems could've looked at the data 2 years ago and concluded "this is stil too risky for humans", outside of the demonstrated safe anti aging applications, producing proven-safe proteins.
I do think the technique could've become safe... the delivery mechanism was flawed. Gene therapy is coming someday, and whatever pseudo-viral delivery mechanism is used will probably also be the best delivery mechanism for MRNA based therapies so that these strands don't land in random cells all around the body.
https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/06/16/researcher-we-made-a-big-mistake-on-covid-19-vaccine/
It hit me the other day, the sheer absurdity, that someone who is technically a homeless dropout could foresee an extremely rare fail case with a bleeding edge technique like this.
Follow
@xenmen @TapWaterAddict @MechaSilvio @disclosetv@twtr.plus
That almost sounds, like it is impossible to do 10 year old test in 1 year 
But no matter what, normies always told me that "we no longer need long term tests, the science had advanced beyond that."
