Please correct me if I’m wrong.
My current understanding is that these vaccines gene therapies target certain strains of covid. They don’t provide protection against newer versions. Natural immunity is broader and does provide (at least some) protection against different strains.
So the correct strategy is (would have been) letting covid spread through the population and treat it with the best methods available: vit D, zinc, Ivermectin. Compulsory gene therapies and lockdowns were another incorrect protocol, similar to putting people on ventilators initially.
The worst part is that this was known for quite some time based on data from outside the US (e.g. India, and South America). But it was suppressed, and instead ineffective and harmful “vax” and authoritarian measures were pushed for political reasons. Many decision-makers and propagandists deserve long jail sentences for this, because they killed and harmed a large number of people for political (and monetary) reasons.
@Bro-Drillard @Jdogg247
Yes, that would be obviously THE best strategy...
If reducing deaths was your goal.
But when you change the goal to great reset, every single step starts looking rational.
So, politicians are either retarded, or evil. But it's on you what you end up believing.
@Bro-Drillard @Jdogg247
For instance, our government found out, that people are willing to pay 100 crowns per party in order to ensure they are safe by using a test at home... So they want to ban it.
Because.... If you want everyone "safe", you have to put all of unvaccinated people to ONE PLACE to take test. (So the 99 percent can get infected from the 1 positive person at the same time)
As the old saying says, do not assume malice, where you can explain the actions by stupidity. Well, THIS CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY STUPIDITY ANYMORE!!!