I am so tired of stopping people and correcting them. I know I sound like a Karren.
But It drives me crazy whenever anyone even implies, that lockdowns are caused by covid. NO, they are caused by politicians. Virus does not take your rights. And implying that feels so insulting to me.
Please believe me, I understand. I don't make scenes but I would say "Lockdown" when someone would blame covid for something. Recently less so because I am wore out. I have helped to change some perspectives but the majority still follow blindly.
What we seem to have is a very select group of self serving people that have convinced themselves their junk government science is license to censure and coerce because they know better what’s good for the future of the human race
Right? @slovborg
@Dianathy @Syberia @slovborg
Yes... But it is even worse.
These people believe, they have right to force people to do literal medical experiments. And when they cause 1 000 000 deaths, are they going to stop, look and shake under the weight of dread they have caused?
No... When you control from above, and cause 1 000 000 deaths, you shrug and try again.
@slovborg @LukeAlmighty @Syberia
Wrong, original models suggesting millions of deaths were off by a factor of 10 and continuing to base responses on faulty modeling has resulted in tons of excess deaths not directly related to COVID but the responses instead. Keep living in fear of you want but you really should keep it to yourself if you don’t want to sound like a douche
@slovborg @LukeAlmighty @Syberia
I’d say well over 90% of the population either jabbed or naturally immune
And just a warning, anything you say about not being able to survive without an mRNA shot will be immediately dismissed
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784013
The cumulative death toll until then was certainly over 600k, so the numbers assuming 80% infected (a reasonable attack rate when no measures are being taken, as demonstrated by say the outbreak in Iquitos) – imply at least 2.4 million dead.
The initial report from March 2020 which we are disputing as having overestimated assumed 2.2 million dead in US, while explicitly stating this is in the assumption of "the (unlikely) absence of any control measures or spontaneous changes in individual behaviour".
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf
Verdict: the initial reports were, in fact, right on mark.
@slovborg @LukeAlmighty @Syberia
Thank you for providing links to all the propaganda used to orchestrate this charade. You are incapable of being non-objective and therefor no longer interesting. Natural immunity provides better and longer protection which comes with additional benefits. The models were wrong and sadly we’ll never know the lives that could have been spared if we focused on protecting in the vulnerable, developing therapeutics and treating the symptoms correctly
@slovborg @LukeAlmighty @Syberia
Judgement calls are not science and trying to defend them as if they were with claims that can not be proven indicates fraud. How about this, if there truly were a global disaster at hand, no one would have made billions from helping, Douche
One of the key steps in scientific method is building a model that lets you call a prediction of event outcome BEFORE it transpires – this allows for backchecking and confirming or rejecting the hypothesis. Given the data we have, the hypothesis has been confirmed.
And no, something being a disaster does not, in any way, mean it is impossible to profit from it. In fact, those subscribing to Keynesian school of economics will point out that, quite contrary, it is exactly disasters that allow one to profit.
@slovborg @LukeAlmighty @Syberia
You can make yourself sound as much of a douche as you wish but you are wrong, guessing isn’t science and when money gets involved there is always deception. You act like you have faith in human nature all while claiming to know how government office is the catapult to the deep state elitism 🙄
Pick a slant and stick with it please
@Dianathy @Syberia
Problem is that Slovborg is an academic idiot. A perfect product of educational system. If you put in front of him 8 feathers and 2 guns, he will proudly say that there are 4 feathers per gun, thinking that by inserting numbers into formula, he solved an issue, while completelly missing the fact, that there's a dead pidgeon with hole in its chest on the floor.
