He defends it by saying that it’s totally different for black Haitians to exterminate White Haitians than for Payton Gendron shooting up grocery stores over White genocide because… reasons. He literally just goes “wow you can’t make that comparison!” and doesn’t tell you why when prompted, which is him just admitted that it’s a legit comparison and he thinks he can wow-just-wow his way out of the analogy.

What an evil anti-White piece of shit.

Nah, NEETZsche is making things up again

So you're accusing neet of being a liar?

even just reading through his own version of events, it seems like he is drawing totally radical conclusions at a minimum.

>He literally just goes “wow you can’t make that comparison!” and doesn’t tell you why when prompted

sounds very much like dave said they are not equivalent, and neet is representing that as an entirely different assertion. absurd and dishonest, or just hysterical and legitimately retarded

>sounds very much like dave said they are not equivalent

Insisting that things are “not equivalent” does not invalidate all comparisons between them. If Dave argues that Whites may not use indiscriminate racial violence just as a general rule, but then turns around and supports blacks using indiscriminate racial violence, him finding a difference between the White scenario and the black one is just shifting the goalposts.

Which he does a lot. He either doesn’t consider the implications of his arguments or, more likely, he doesn’t care, because he’ll just take whatever cheap shot he can to attack Whites.

>Insisting that things are “not equivalent” does not invalidate all comparisons between them

it also doesnt mean that he implicitly SUPPORTS a genocide, you absolute dimwit

>it also doesnt mean that he implicitly SUPPORTS a genocide, you absolute dimwit

Oof, bad timing for that. He just explicitly defended White extermination and White sexual slavery. Here is your opportunity to apologize and save face, fuckwit.

>indiscriminate racial violence
>slaves killing their masters

you cannot possibly be this confident and this retarded

So you’re not accepting your opportunity to save face. He defended the Haitian revolution, the outcome of which was the extermination of Whites and the sexual slavery of White women. This wasn’t about “slaves killing their masters.” Him presenting it as being about that is, at best, ignorant.

So did you fail to read the part I cited where the Haitian “revolutionaries” did this (you’re a retard) or did you deliberately ignore this (you’re a malicious liar)?

Admitting you’re being retarded is basically your last opportunity to save face. If you dodge this question, the default answer is you’re a malicious liar.

youre using a dispute over details of the haitian revolution to say that dave supports indiscriminate racial violence?

if your version of events is true, dave is mistaken. if your version of events is false, dave isn't supporting indiscriminate racial violence.

even if youre right, youre fucking wrong. the problem is that youre twisting dave's words to begin with and are dishonestly representing what he is actually saying.

>if your version of events is true, dave is mistaken. if your version of events is false, dave isn’t supporting indiscriminate racial violence.

This post that you’re replying to? It wasn’t about Dave. It was about you. It was about if you noticed that I informed Dave of what the Haitian revolution did, and that he defended it anyway. I asked you if just didn’t notice it, and offered you the chance to save some small amount of face by admitting you being ignorant. Alternatively, you were given the choice of admitting, tacitly or otherwise, that you did notice this, and that you were lying maliciously.

You were made to choose between taking a small L (ignorance/retardation) and a big L (being a malicious liar). You chose the latter. On your own free will, you chose that.

dave qualified his defence in the exact same sentence u sperg

And the qualifications say he should find the Haitian revolution unjustified because it went way, way beyond those qualifications. Stop lying, dude.

It’s hilarious that you claim that killing innocent people couldn’t possibly be justified by the conditions that led to the Haitian revolution, but can be justified because you live in a country where Ibram X. Kendi gets obnoxiously high speaking fees.

It’s hilarious that you claim that White extermination and sexual slavery is “slaves killing their masters to secure their freedom.” You defend sex slavery because fuck ypipo.

No, I don’t defend it, I just think arguing about it is dumb because you keep conflating the idea that the revolution was justified, and that everything they did in that revolution was justified.

>No, I don’t defend it, I just think arguing about it is dumb because you keep conflating the idea that the revolution was justified, and that everything they did in that revolution was justified.

It’s a little late to backpedal, Dave. You’ve been evading this topic for days now, pushing a week. But I’ll give you a chance to redeem yourself after directly defending the Haitian revolution (White extermination and sexual slavery):

Do you or do you not believe that Whites are justified in implementing Equal Protections under the law for themselves?

I think you’re both wrong. You’re trying to pigeon hole him into taking one extreme over another. Your premise over the last week has, from what I can see, been “it’s okay when Whites do it because of my understanding of the ‘equal protections act””.

On the other hand is seems like he is okay with blacks murdering Whites because “muh slavery”. You will never come to an agreement here because neither of you will concede any ground. This is just autism at this point.

I’m okay with slaves of any race murdering their masters of any race in order for the slaves to secure their freedom. The question of whether the killing is OK with me doesn’t change depending on race combination.

Indeed the tables have turned. Blacks and jews seem to be the masters of Whites now. Would you find it morally acceptable if Whites genocided blacks and jews in order to secure their sovereignty?