@nukie
To be fair, there were "some" whities in the original video too.

@LukeAlmighty also tbh if you grabbed me out of nowhere like that I wouldn't even know my name because I would've been shifted out of my balance completely

@xue
This anwser makes it actually worse.

@LukeAlmighty how? that humans do basic interactions without thinking?

Are you really policing yourself and making conscious decision to say "good morning" "thank you" and "goodbye" every time you enter the shop?
Dont be ridiculous

@xue @LukeAlmighty The guy's a clinical case autiste

@NEETzsche @xue
And they say, it's the autistic people who are unable to catch the social clues...

I often suspect that I'm mildly autistic myself because so many of my friends are and because of what my hobbies are. I think I mentioned this several times now but I have some memory issues: I think that psychiatry just pathologizes personality types with a lot of its diagnoses, including ass burgers

this is one of those times where foucalt's archeology of knowledge is actually applicable. if you don't do repetitive makework and get enthusiastic about trivial stuff you are defective in normieland.

@NEETzsche @xue @LukeAlmighty People under around 90 IQ are unable to process hypotheticals.

You could ask, "How would you have felt yesterday if you hadn't eaten breakfast?"

They would respond, "But I did eat breakfast. What do you mean?"

"Yeah, but if you hadn't, what would it have been like?"

"No, you didn't hear me...I ate breakfast yesterday."

"But if you hadn't..."

"But I did..."

I'm aware. Compelling thing to remind me of though

@NEETzsche @xue @LukeAlmighty In the case of this video, someone in the 90-110 range might quickly say something like their current age minus 10 years, and then when challenged realize that they were asked a trick question and laugh about it.

Someone lower than that range would continue to insist that they are right and that the person asking the question is an idiot, without parsing the words more carefully or imagining the scenario (of being "born 10 years ago").

@victor @NEETzsche @LukeAlmighty
ay lmao
IQ isnt real, thats freemason bait to lure narcissistic individuals

"Oh look at me, i scored 190 on solving mazes and maching patterns" ayyy lmao

t. subhuman polack

@NEETzsche @victor @LukeAlmighty
yo i didnt know you were of polish orgin
what are your favorite pierogi and unexpectedly won battle?

@xue @victor @NEETzsche
Go to a gypsie occupied area and talk to them. TALK TO THEM FOR 10 FUCKING MINUTES, and tell me, that IQ doesn't exist.

@LukeAlmighty @victor @NEETzsche I aint gonna do that
first of all, i dont speak gypisie
but also, i value my belongings

Based

@LukeAlmighty @NEETzsche @victor that being said IQ is a spook

@LukeAlmighty @NEETzsche @victor yet another metric that tries to reduce something much complicated to a single number, like wtf, its loosing information on purpose

>it's reductive therefore it's inaccurate

Cope.

@xue @victor @NEETzsche
Yes.
Reducing a complex phenomenon into a single number is the essence of any useful metric.

@LukeAlmighty @victor @NEETzsche
First, IQ isnt metric, for metric you need two variables
It more resembles estimator but:
1. You can make any estimator you want, and it doesnt need to provide any useful information
2. What kind of estimator that is, when it can return different data for the same person

It is arbitrary device, to check how good you are with solving special case of mazes
And you attribute any real world value to it? lmao

It's literally a metric. It measures something. You just don't like what it measures.

@NEETzsche @victor @xue
2. What kind of estimator that is, when it can return different data for the same person

If you measure a person's height in morning and evening, you get a different result.

What a useless metric that is...

>If you measure a person's height in morning and evening, you get a different result.

Clearly, distance is a social construct. Physics BTFO

@NEETzsche @victor @LukeAlmighty metric has to do all of the below
1. it has to equal 0 only the same element
2. it has to be symetric, d(a,b) = d(b,a)
3. triangle inequality

It isnt metric, it is another made up shit by psychologists, who dont care about science, they just write what they think

It's literally a "psychometric" dude.