this is one of those times where foucalt's archeology of knowledge is actually applicable. if you don't do repetitive makework and get enthusiastic about trivial stuff you are defective in normieland.

@NEETzsche @xue @LukeAlmighty People under around 90 IQ are unable to process hypotheticals.

You could ask, "How would you have felt yesterday if you hadn't eaten breakfast?"

They would respond, "But I did eat breakfast. What do you mean?"

"Yeah, but if you hadn't, what would it have been like?"

"No, you didn't hear me...I ate breakfast yesterday."

"But if you hadn't..."

"But I did..."

I'm aware. Compelling thing to remind me of though

@NEETzsche @xue @LukeAlmighty In the case of this video, someone in the 90-110 range might quickly say something like their current age minus 10 years, and then when challenged realize that they were asked a trick question and laugh about it.

Someone lower than that range would continue to insist that they are right and that the person asking the question is an idiot, without parsing the words more carefully or imagining the scenario (of being "born 10 years ago").

@victor @NEETzsche @LukeAlmighty
ay lmao
IQ isnt real, thats freemason bait to lure narcissistic individuals

"Oh look at me, i scored 190 on solving mazes and maching patterns" ayyy lmao

t. subhuman polack

@NEETzsche @victor @LukeAlmighty
yo i didnt know you were of polish orgin
what are your favorite pierogi and unexpectedly won battle?

@xue @victor @NEETzsche
Go to a gypsie occupied area and talk to them. TALK TO THEM FOR 10 FUCKING MINUTES, and tell me, that IQ doesn't exist.

@LukeAlmighty @victor @NEETzsche I aint gonna do that
first of all, i dont speak gypisie
but also, i value my belongings

Based

@LukeAlmighty @NEETzsche @victor that being said IQ is a spook

@LukeAlmighty @NEETzsche @victor yet another metric that tries to reduce something much complicated to a single number, like wtf, its loosing information on purpose

>it's reductive therefore it's inaccurate

Cope.

@xue @victor @NEETzsche
Yes.
Reducing a complex phenomenon into a single number is the essence of any useful metric.

@LukeAlmighty @victor @NEETzsche
First, IQ isnt metric, for metric you need two variables
It more resembles estimator but:
1. You can make any estimator you want, and it doesnt need to provide any useful information
2. What kind of estimator that is, when it can return different data for the same person

It is arbitrary device, to check how good you are with solving special case of mazes
And you attribute any real world value to it? lmao

It's literally a metric. It measures something. You just don't like what it measures.

@NEETzsche @victor @xue
2. What kind of estimator that is, when it can return different data for the same person

If you measure a person's height in morning and evening, you get a different result.

What a useless metric that is...

>If you measure a person's height in morning and evening, you get a different result.

Clearly, distance is a social construct. Physics BTFO

@NEETzsche @LukeAlmighty @victor@crucible.wanna play inter-field cases?
If you do the same measurment, on the same set (person) with same tools, you would get the same results for that cartesian product.

You cant do this with IQ, its random

@NEETzsche @victor @LukeAlmighty metric has to do all of the below
1. it has to equal 0 only the same element
2. it has to be symetric, d(a,b) = d(b,a)
3. triangle inequality

It isnt metric, it is another made up shit by psychologists, who dont care about science, they just write what they think

It's literally a "psychometric" dude.

@NEETzsche @victor @LukeAlmighty
oh, let me think of another
p s y c h o m e t r i c
xDDDD
Your score will be 5 and Luke's 10.
Here, valuable, scientific invention

@xue @victor @NEETzsche
Btw, do not think, that sociology is not full of garbage.

for example, EQ is a bullshot metric, that miraculously corresponds perfectly to breast size.

But IQ is not one of them.

@LukeAlmighty @xue @victor @NEETzsche >EQ is a bullshot metric, that miraculously corresponds perfectly to breast size
Yo, what the fuck?!

@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Women with big boobs have no problem in any social situation, and everyone is interested to talking to them about their feelings.

therefore, they have a high EQ.

@LukeAlmighty @victor @xue @NEETzsche No, I don't think that's what EQ is supposed to be.

@LukeAlmighty @Jens_Rasmussen @victor @NEETzsche great proof