@Hyolobrika @dave search for the term "conditional whiteness" and almost all the articles will be by jews arguing they are not white because whiteness at different times has different membership which has affected jews a lot. basically, if shit hits the fan, jews won't be considered white anymore by other whites so the protection afforded by being considered white is illusory for them. there's another term related to this that I can't remember because my brain isn't working well right now.
@Hyolobrika @dave okay, the other term i was thinking of was "provisional whiteness"

@Moon @Hyolobrika It’s understandable that they would believe that, given the context in which those authors grew up (i.e. after having like a third of them wiped out in the span of about 5 years). It’s not at all a given when thinking long-term, though. Cultures tend towards integration over time.

If we’re talking about Orthodox Jews that truly believe in their own superiority (I mean in a “divine right” sense, not just based on stats that show they do tend to be pretty successful as a group) and thus consider “whites” to be beneath them, then you can say they’re not white. But at that point it’s self-fulfilling, since your refusal to integrate is what causes the lack of integration.

@dave @Hyolobrika@berserker.town @Moon
What a nice way of switching it.
If all of them said "I am jewish" or "I am white", I would get it.

But all of the switching and all the cases of "fellow white people" followed by "as a jew" is feeding the Antisemitism more then Soros ever could.

Because at that point, they make it REALLY HARD to argue that the actions are not made in malice.

@LukeAlmighty @Hyolobrika @Moon I will invite you to read the rest of the thread, because you’re responding to points that were already addressed.

Follow

@dave @Hyolobrika@berserker.town @Moon
I did read it, and responded to you with my previous post.

@dave @Hyolobrika@berserker.town @Moon
To say: They like to behave that way
is not an argument that makes the behavior any less destructive or malicious.

@LukeAlmighty @Hyolobrika @Moon I specifically addressed the point you raised about conflicting identities long before you started writing it. I did so in a different sub-thread, but you’re insisting that you read it, so how exactly are you repeating points back to me that were already addressed?

@dave @Hyolobrika@berserker.town @Moon
Because "they like it that way" does not address it.

@LukeAlmighty @dave @Hyolobrika @Moon Why is no one mentioning the Irish? There was a time they weren’t white either.

@dave @Hyolobrika@berserker.town @Moon
But ok Dave, please, help me understand.
1) Do the Jews understand the identity politics and the concept of 2 identities.
2) Are they capable of understanding, that slandering one identity will hurt it?
3) Do they understand, that running to the 2nd identity after hurting the first is an aggressive act?

4) And if all 3 are correct, please, how am I supposed to not assume malice?

@LukeAlmighty @dave @Hyolobrika @Moon Jews arnt the same human species as Whites

Jews don't value honesty and fairness

How many times do we have to see the same genetic pattern to say NO MORE
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.