Okay but what’s the difference between them? I saw tomassi’s hedonistic tweet already, no surprise he’s jewish, but can you REALLY gloat about how fuentes is all about building families given his treatment of the few that leave his plantation via marriage?

This is very odd, fuentes is already at the age where all his friends should be getting married every summer, but he’s still acting like he’s a 17 yo zoomer with all the time in the world. He’s done, to my fairly limited knowledge, nothing to promote or foster family building other than showing young men how to go on a date - with another man, at least.

To date he’s done everything he can to make his followers as repellant he can to would-be wives, and now he’s going hunting for low-quality scalps to prove how super traditional he is.

My metric for measuring the worth of a movement is seeing what it does to help young, worthless, down-on-their luck young men to become respectable husbands and fathers. That’s the BIGGEST thing we need to be doing, because it’s the only thing that REALLY matters at the end of the day. We have enough unemployed NEETS willing to die for the cause when the blue helmets make landfall - we don’t have enough who’re willing to grind 40 years to raise 4 kids.

Accusing tomassi of being a simp (which he may be, IDK) is funny because at least he’d be simping for WOMEN. Nick has that much grosser mentality that simping for boys is somehow better. It’s good to have brotherhood, sure, but I’ve seen how he treats his ‘friends’ - there’s no true depth to any of their catty, homosexual friendship to begin with.

This is just….a shrug really. It’s like arguing between minor variations of poop - do you opt for eternal “want someday” bachelorhood with your incel bros, or do you want shitskin grindset “high valu male” bachelorhood?

It’s too bad, because fuentes could still kind of turn things around with an intervention to tell his remaining fans that it’s time to grow up and start families. Y’know, since he supposedly cares so much about that.