@moffintosh @dcc
> Complains about rich people using money to get more money
> Refuses to complain about state giving the rich even more money without offering you anything.
I don't get you man.
Refuses to complain about state giving the rich even more money without offering you anything.
I just don't do it as much because the capital owners control it anyway, and by getting rid of them one gets two birds with one stone
@LukeAlmighty @dcc Capitalism has nonracial character, expecially in the last 40 years
@moffintosh @dcc
The worst thing about racism is, that it doesn't matter how non-racist you are, as long as the others don't see you as part of their group.
And the jews in the government do see themselves as part of Israel more, then part of the country they rule over.
@LukeAlmighty
You seem to assume that it's limited to jews and motivated by racial interests, skipping over the fact that this is done to keep israel aligned with the US/west, which in turn is done to keep a guard on middle estern contries selling their oil in anything else than US dollars. This keeps the demand for US dollars high which allows the country to run on massive deficits and keep financing it's capitalist class
@moffintosh
> You seem to assume that it's limited to jews and motivated by racial interests
"motivated by racial interests"
YES
"limited to jews"
Who owns the money printers?
![]()
@moffintosh
Also:
> allows the country to run on massive deficits and keep financing it's capitalist class
And that is exactly the issue. Deficit is a different word for money printing. Because the deficit is towards the central bank. (That is a word play made to hide the fact, that the central banks are direct cause of inflation)
@moffintosh
If there was no money printing, the economy would look quite different :D
That is a word play made to hide the fact, that the central banks are A direct cause of inflation
If there was no money printing, the economy would look quite different :D
The boom 'n' bust cicle would be more accentuated, just give a look to history prior the global abandonment of the gold standard.
Voluntary infkation with money printing is but a bandage on the falling rate of profit
@moffintosh
Yes.
And I say, that is is prefferable to all of my money being taken away through the inflation.
@LukeAlmighty That doesn't solve the problem with capitalism though😂
@moffintosh
As far, as I understand your side, the problem with capitalism is, that people with money can force you to give them your money through bad trade conditions.
But a money printer is this problem on steroids. They steal value of your money.... even without any need for your agreement.
As far, as I understand your side, the problem with capitalism is, that people with money can force you to give them your money through bad trade conditions.
That is... partial.
In a small summary: production is a social activity yet the fruits of labor are for only the owners, market instability blows up the economy periodically destroying livelyhoods of millions, labor rights are in antithesis to the economic system, the moneyed get to control the government and state and use it for their own interests, skrew the majority of the population, it consumes the environment driving us closer to a climate catastrophe (which will send my extended family's homes underwater, destroy the economy and cause millions of refugees), alienation from one's job, consumerism, wars to control foreign markets and resources, fragmentation of community and society and so on and so forth...
But a money printer is this problem on steroids. They steal value of your money.... even without any need for your agreement.
Using a Beretta instead of a Lock, they already didn't have my permission, the difference is minuscule.
@moffintosh
> production is a social activity yet the fruits of labor are for only the owners
I have no idea where did this come from. ![]()
@LukeAlmighty Marxian short for "production of commodities, in it's complex, requires the participation of a vast number of people who have to cooperate across firms to produce a final product that will be then sold to the consumer. Despite this being a social activity, as it requires the collaboration and dialogue of many, the ones who reap the benefits and have the legal right to decide when, how or what to produce and the conditions of labor are a small circle of owners who at best only contribute in small part to produce a commodity"
@Jens_Rasmussen @LukeAlmighty *planned by the owner class, if ever, not by the people
@Jens_Rasmussen @LukeAlmighty source?
@moffintosh @Jens_Rasmussen
> My argument is so bad, I will rather force you to read 300 pages of shit, and if you still don't agree, I will just send another book instead
@LukeAlmighty @Jens_Rasmussen Sorry if I have actualy sources to back what I say instead of just following what the media says
@moffintosh @Jens_Rasmussen
300 pages is not a source, it's a trash heap.
@moffintosh @Jens_Rasmussen
The entire "here is a book" thing is not an argument, it is a conversation killer.
I am sorry, but I want to know what you think. What you believe. But this is not what you believe. This is "shut up, or spent 3 weeks of your life if dare want to disagree".
And if he did, how long before you threw another book at him? How many books does he have to read, before he has the right to disagree while being "well informed"?
@moffintosh @Jens_Rasmussen
I see.... You're unable to comprehend the part of other people living their actual lives, and working as well as spending their time with family.
@LukeAlmighty @Jens_Rasmussen Then don't give recomandations like you're a doctor, so to say
@moffintosh @Jens_Rasmussen
Second: We're talking about deep analysis of an argument, not skipping through a visual novel.
There is a difference. And a deep one at that.
When you read a romance, you can skip pages, and not miss anything. If you read a proof, you have to read each word multiple times, and return after every sentence.
@LukeAlmighty @Jens_Rasmussen
spent 3 weeks of your life
I devoured 300 pages books in a day when I was 16
How many books does he have to read, before he has the right to disagree while being "well informed"?
Until one has at least a rough idea of what one is talking about