"Colonialism bad" can only apply to Whites.
It's the same reason "slavery bad" also only applies to Whites, despite all of human history having used slavery.
Unfortunately, kikes love their double-standards, and will whip Whites with their own morals, while giving different ones to any non-White.
the idea that universal reciprocity forms the bedrock of a valid moral system is the result of a specific gene mutation from northwest europe
the idea of a double standard as a concept, let alone being a bad thing, is completely alien to 99% of the planet. double standards do not exist, they are standards. had a whole rant about this
@All_bonesJones @Alex1488 @sickburnbro
That actually sounds like an interesting theory.
Do you have more info on it?
How does that make sense?
If somebody is punished for a crime they committed, by having the same thing inflicted upon them, how does that never end?
@Alex1488 @sickburnbro @All_bonesJones
Because you create an oscilation. Each punishment causing oposite reaction forcing your hand to add even more energy into the conflict.
If somebody killed another person, that person should be put to death.
If somebody stole, they should return what they stole or be fined an equal amount of the value they stole.
If somebody raped, well, that gets a bit tricky. Do we rape rapists? Anyways.
The idea of "an eye for an eye leaves the world blind" is a fallacious argument, because somebody getting punished for a crime, doesn't then justify punishment on the punisher for having delt out said punishment. It doesn't make sense in any way you spin it.
@Alex1488 @sickburnbro @All_bonesJones
You cannot put the "same value" punishment, exactly, because the world isn't a math formula.
If punishment for stealing is returning, then you made stealing 100% profitable no matter how successful you are. If you rape a rapist, he will win twice. Do you really not see the issue with 1:1 justice?
Ok, so what do you do then? Well, the anwser is 100:1 justice. It is also called deterrent or punitive justice. With punishments at a 100x severity of the crime, the criminal does everything he can to avoid said crime. But once he is punished unjustly, he will feel justified to push out 100 times his pain back into the world. To avoid that case, the bast solution we have is still just the presumption of innocence. The famous "beyond reasonable doubt" standart, that we game up on as a society 15 years ago.
So, my point simply is, that justice is insanely complicated shit, that will never be balanced. 🤷♂️
@Alex1488 @sickburnbro @All_bonesJones
Also, there is a huge economic problem with value.
--> 💍
This is a ring that you gave your wife. You payed 100$ for it, and it always brings joy into your life.
I stole and destroyed it. Your wife is now depressed, and you are furious. I pay you 500$, and you buy a new ring, but your wife's smile doesn't return. The memories of your honeymoon are forever shattered. Was justice served? I payed way more then what I took.
I hate this imperfect world. 
