BTW, have you noticed, that people jumped on the bait of including political framing in definitions?

Let me ilustrate:
Incel:
A member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile towards women and men who are sexually active.

Think for a moment. Is that an actual definition? No, it isn't. The first part of it is definition, because definition has to desctibe some objective reality.

So: >>A member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually<<

This is a fine definition. I don't think it's perfect, but it's servicable.

But, people have since started including the word "typically" into it. And that's ridiculous. If I say, that cars have typically a black color, that doesn't mean that cars can't be yellow. In fact, the color does have literally nothing to do with the definition of a car. So, while there are hundreds of things typical of a car, literally not a single one of them should be ever included in a definition.

So, why is it in this definition? Because it's literally there only to influence your opinion on the topic. Since writing (>>the jews want you to hate this group<<) would be too on the nose, they just smear them with the most inflamatory claim that still does seem at least believabvle, and hope people will be too dumb to notice.

And, people are indeed too retarded to notice.