Question stolen from Twitter:
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
my choice and rationale
@BowsacNoodle
Exactly. I don't care about "being completely safe". I really don't want people to die. The blue is literally the only good choice.
But man, do I wish the red pressers the world they would get.
re: my choice and rationale
re: my choice and rationale
@Griffith @BowsacNoodle
> If an absurd hypothetical, that literally never happened....
But it didn't happen, and you knew it won't. So, pressinng red is the selfish option, and you knew it would be.
re: my choice and rationale
re: my choice and rationale
@Griffith @BowsacNoodle
Do you understand the concept of world existing outside of your "everyone agrees with me" framework?
re: my choice and rationale
@Griffith @BowsacNoodle
Pressing red assumes that everyone is as selfish as you, or that people are not worth saving.
Pressing blue is hoping that at least 50% of people are good people.
@Griffith @BowsacNoodle
There is no potential bad outcome, if everyone pushes blue either.
Do you seriously not see, that you wrote a tautology?
You wrote a "there is no bad outcome in 0.001% of cases" while I said that there is no bad outcome if just 50% of people are good.
@Griffith @BowsacNoodle
And yes, I know, that the entire question is a framing issue, but a truly interesting one.
@Griffith @BowsacNoodle
And that worst outcome is exactly, where your thought process lead us to though :D
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating @Griffith @BowsacNoodle
Well, you could call me midwhit if that is a sufficient explanation, but I simply do not expect everyone to act rational. Where did that ever happen in hystory?
Nah. I want to go for the option, that ends up with noone dying. Simple as that. And we both know, that there will be many people who will try to save everyone, and that knowledge itself turns the red button from "obvious" to a selfish one.
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating @Griffith @BowsacNoodle
Don't you think that expecting people to act "fully rationally" is the peak midwhitery though?
I press blue expecting that at least 50% of people will either be stupid, or willing to ensure the good outcome for everyone, since anyone without a robotic thinking will know that there are people in the blue category.
@ceo_of_monoeye_dating @Griffith @BowsacNoodle
And obviously, in here, it is 30x easier to press blue then in real life.
The real threat to life would overwtire everyone's real logic into pressing red anyway. Therefore, this thread is just a funny post to me anyway.
Please, I hope noone takes it too seriously. :D
@monsterislandcolonizer @Griffith @BowsacNoodle @ceo_of_monoeye_dating
Yes, obviously the revealed preferences would be everyone pressing the red, since it would turn a philosophical/mathematical discussion into a real life danger.
@monsterislandcolonizer @Griffith @BowsacNoodle @ceo_of_monoeye_dating
Yes, it's a framing problem to be sure. But you also have to understand that humans ARE NOT ROBOTS.
my choice and rationale
Blue button because it’s the superior moral choice. Moreover, the red button world becomes shithole tier hell with all of the genuinely cooperative people eliminated. High trust is gone and you have global izzat chicanery. May God have mercy on red buttoners.