What do lefties mean when they say maga?
I mean, it seems like they believe to be referring to something definable, but the term is descriptively completely useless.
these terms largely mean nothing and are a way to pretend to have opinions and thoughts while being retarded
so treat the people who say them accordingly
@brigrammer
Nah... language was the primary weapon of the left for decades. If you're still willing to ingore their manipulations, then you'll get sucker punched again by a law changing meaning under your legs.
When it comes to the MAGA, I am worried, that they used the word to create a simulacrum of reality, where instead of people being so pissed off at the woke politics, that they chose the one representative, whosomehwhat slightly opposed it, they created a fake reality where one demon like figgure managed to collect enough blind support to push policies that noone believed in.
Just like the person you just posted.
If you're still willing to ingore their manipulations
I am autistic - I am not fooled by them, but also know they will not have their minds swayed by me
where instead of people being so pissed off at the woke politics
most humans are not people and do not think but just emote - worrying about what they think is pointless as you cannot do anything about it
Just like the person you just posted.
Hitler would talk to his fellow workers about the problems of his country, get them in complete agreement, and the next day find out they went back to factory defaults of supporting the rape of Germany
I don't know your politics, and I don't agree with Hitler on plenty of things - but I fully agree with his very tired assessment of the masses
one demon like figgure [sic] managed to collect enough blind support to push policies that noone believed in
bro, that's the Iran war. you're describing the Iran war.@KuteboiCoder @brigrammer
While yes, war in Iran does fit that description, these lefties believe, that the right is happy for the war, and that as soon as Trump dies, we will return straight to the BLM protests where we belong.
>language was the primary weapon
The deconstruction of language you mean
>used the word to create a simulacrum of reality
>"What is a woman?"
If you're talking about debating someone, then you need to get technical and ask them to define their terms with precision. They hate that, because they don't understand things intentionally and having to do this displays their lack of honesty and beliefs
@wizardmanperson @brigrammer
And that is why I asked the question.
To know all possible definitions, and recognize when they do the switch mid sentence.
You're not talking to them, but to their audience (even when imaginary).
"For my friends, the truth and my arguments. For my enemies, a torrent of mockery and abuse"
Yeah I don’t really find it beneficial to engage in arguments with my political enemies. Bunch of ugly faggots with shit for brains
I see no reason to be earnest with a dishonest person.
Indeed; cracks me up — they virtually always have a higher opinion of themselves than anyone else does
There's a lot to be gained, but one needs to realise what and when and where.
@wizardmanperson @brigrammer
You misunderstand.
You don't need to understand the human body to kill a human. Yet, to heal him, you need to know every detail.
Same goes for debating of poisoned terms. You need to understand it, if you want to combat it. I don't expect them to be moral about it, but when I tell a leftie, that there is just 1 gender, and reason them to it, it does break them.
You don't need to understand the human body to kill a human. Yet, to heal him, you need to know every detail.
when it comes to what they are thinking, you answered you own question - who cares, just kill them
