@11112011
Didn't notice this was about Trump initially, but I've got a question that is irrelevant to who the client is.
Shouldn't the phrasing be something different than "client perpetrated a crime"? Wouldn't a court have to find the client guilty first to be able to definitely say that? So I'm thinking a correct way of wording it would be "the client perpetuated a potential crime".
I thought lawyers were very careful with their language, so this makes me wonder if this is their bias seeping in, or maybe they're not that experienced? Idk...
This was interesting, but probably not for the reason you found it interesting.