@colonelj
They probably defederated because they no longer had anything to gain. They federated because they needed a phone app. Once the bigger phone apps domain blocked gab, that was over. All gab was left was wasting resources on federating with just a couple of instances that weren't even that friendly with gab.
@fluffy @colonelj
I think it was even stated by the likes of Torba at some point. They had the issue that their own app was banned from iPhone/Android app stores, and they struggled like that for a while. And when they federated, they were advertising like crazy that you could use any fedi app to log into gab.
@fluffy @colonelj
Wouldn't work for boomers. They tried making their own "app store", which was a glorified page on their side from which you could download their app, (and at some point other fedi apps). But good luck teaching boomers to sideload anything, or to trust other places than the official Google Play Store. And this is for Android. For iPhone you can't even sideload at all.
@fluffy @colonelj
The lack of an easy accessible app has been the biggest issue they had for a while. Boomers would have problems using gab from their phones, and constantly requested an official gab app. And since they got banned from the official stores, they struggled to teach boomers to sideload apps. So federating was a "solution" for them.
At least my memory is still pretty good.
https://wedistribute.org/2019/05/gab-is-forking-mastodon-and-joining-the-fediverse/
@fluffy @colonelj
>they joined the fediverse to siphon new users.
Doubt it. If I remember correctly, when they joined they had more accounts than most, if not all of fedi at that time. There is of course the problem of how many of those accounts were actually in use, but considering how often people have multiple accounts on fedi too, I think they kinda cancel each other out.
@fluffy @colonelj
They rode on them being big because they were desperate to be seen with respect and admiration. Torba's ego was definitely hit like a ton of bricks when fedi was so openly mocking him to his face.
He was literally trying to subvert the fediverse and claim people should follow his way, because "look at how many people we have, so you should be in awe of us, and follow our lead". It was playing politics to grab power and control over fedi.
Their growth base has always and will always be Twitter/Facebook refugees. Don't know if they were really hoping to gather that much more from fedi. Again, considering the numbers, targeting fedi wouldn't have lead to a much bigger growth. Their main focus should always be Twitter & Facebook.
@fluffy @colonelj
Don't get me wrong, I find it interesting that you think gab had a shot of taking away users from fedi, but even back then I didn't think it was likely. I saw their federation as a way to compensate for their lack of user diversity and numbers by allowing their users to interact with a slightly bigger audience. It was in my view a temporary fix, while they continued trying to get Twitter normies to come over.
@fluffy @colonelj
They hadn't made their move yet. It was still on planning stages from what I can remember when the tweet was made.
>as if it was some deliberate decision
The deliberate decision is in not caring anymore that they're not compatible with everything else. If apps aren't useful anyway, why bother fixing it.
i've not heard this theory before. you say it with such confidence, can you explain why you are sure this was the reason for them?